Outrage without consequences?

• Verfasst von: Steiger, Stefan [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Schünemann, Wolf J. [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Dimmroth, Katharina [VerfasserIn]
• Titel: Outrage without consequences?
• Titelzusatz: Post-Snowden discourses and governmental practice in Germany
• Verf.angabe: Stefan Steiger, Wolf J. Schünemann and Katharina Dimmroth
• Umfang: 10 S.
• Fussnoten: Gesehen am 22.03.2017
• Titel Quelle: Enthalten in: Media and Communication
• Jahr Quelle: 2017
• Band/Heft Quelle: 5(2017), 1, S. 7-16
• DOI: doi:10.17645/mac.v5i1.814
• Datenträger: Online-Ressource
• Sprache: eng
• K10plus-PPN: 1555822312
• K10plus-PPN:
  Universitätsbibliothek
• Lokale URL UB: Zum Volltext

Abstract

In 2013 Edward Snowden’s disclosures of mass surveillance performed by US intelligence agencies seriously irritated politicians and citizens around the globe. This holds particularly true for privacy-sensitive communities in Germany. However, while the public was outraged, intelligence and security cooperation between the United States and Germany has been marked by continuity instead of disruption. The rather insubstantial debate over a so-called “No-Spy-Agreement” between the United States and Germany is just one telling example of the disconnect between public discourse and governmental action, as is the recent intelligence service regulation. This article considers why and where the “Snowden effect” has been lost on different discursive levels. We analyze and compare parliamentary and governmental discourses in the two years after the Snowden revelations by using the Sociology of Knowledge Approach to Discourse (SKAD) to dissect the group-specific statements andinterpretive schemes in 287 official documents by the German Bundestag, selected ministries and agencies within the policy subsystem. These will be analyzed in reference to actual governmental practice.