Contrasting social and cognitive accounts on overimitation

• Verfasst von: Schleihauf, Hanna [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Breyel, Sabine [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Pauen, Sabina [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Höhl, Stefanie [VerfasserIn]
• Titel: Contrasting social and cognitive accounts on overimitation
• Titelzusatz: the role of causal transparency and prior experiences
• Verf.angabe: Hanna Schleihauf, Sabine Graetz, and Sabina Pauen Heidelberg University, Stefanie Hoehl, Heidelberg University and Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig
• Jahr: 2018
• Umfang: 17 S.
• Fussnoten: First published: 23 March 2017 ; Gesehen am 19.03.2020
• Titel Quelle: Enthalten in: Child development
• Ort Quelle: Malden, Mass. : Wiley-Blackwell, 1930
• Jahr Quelle: 2018
• Band/Heft Quelle: 89(2018), 3, Seite 1039-1055
• ISSN Quelle: 1467-8624
• DOI: doi:10.1111/cdev.12780
• Datenträger: Online-Ressource
• Sprache: eng
• K10plus-PPN: 155664308X

Abstract

Three experiments (N=100) examine the influence of causal information on overimitation. In Experiment 1, atransparent reward location reveals that the reward is unaffected by nonfunctional actions. When 5-year-oldsobserve an inefficient and subsequently an efficient strategy to retrieve a reward, they show overimitation inboth phases—even though the reward is visible. In Experiment 2, children observefirst the efficient then theinefficient strategy. The latter is always demonstrated communicatively, whereas the efficient strategy is pre-sented communicatively (2a) or noncommunicatively (2b). Regardless of whether the efficient strategy isemphasized through communication or not, most children do not switch from the efficient to the inefficientstrategy. Depending on the situation, children base their behavior on social motivations or causal information.