Wie können Langzeittherapien mit kürzeren Behandlungen verglichen werden?

• Verfasst von: Benecke, Cord [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Schauenburg, Henning [VerfasserIn]
• Titel: Wie können Langzeittherapien mit kürzeren Behandlungen verglichen werden?
• Titelzusatz: Designprobleme und Lösungsvorschläge am Beispiel der APS-Studie
• Paralleltitel: How can long-termtherapies be compared with shorter term treatment?
• Paralleltitelzusatz: Design problems and solution proposals exemplified by the APD study$hCord Benecke, Dorothea Huber, Henning Schauenburg, Hermann Staats
• Verf.angabe: Cord Benecke, Dorothea Huber, Henning Schauenburg, Hermann Staats
• Umfang: 8 S.
• Fussnoten: Gesehen am 25.08.2017
• Titel Quelle: Enthalten in: Psychotherapeut
• Jahr Quelle: 2016
• Band/Heft Quelle: 61(2016), 6, S. 476-483
• ISSN Quelle: 1432-2080
• DOI: doi:10.1007/s00278-016-0140-1
• Datenträger: Online-Ressource
• Sprache: ger eng
• K10plus-PPN: 1562730576

Abstract

Long-term psychotherapy is not recommended in the current guidelines, which are based on the criteria of evidence-based medicine, as there is a lack of confirmation for long-term psychotherapy by efficacy studies. Using the example of psychoanalytic long-term psychotherapy this article describes six dilemmas which impede the realization of efficacy studies for long-term psychotherapy. Finally, basic elements of a study design are proposed, which are considered as being adequate to compare (psychoanalytic) long-term psychotherapy with shorter treatment forms in terms of outcome and cost-effectiveness. The anxiety and personality disorders (APD) study is briefly described as an example of a study realizing the proposed design.