Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Konnopka, Alexander [VerfasserIn]   i
 Kaufmann, Claudia [VerfasserIn]   i
 Wild, Beate [VerfasserIn]   i
 Szecsenyi, Joachim [VerfasserIn]   i
 Herzog, Wolfgang [VerfasserIn]   i
 Schellberg, Dieter [VerfasserIn]   i
 Schäfert, Rainer [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Cost-utility of a specific collaborative group intervention for patients with functional somatic syndromes
Verf.angabe:Alexander Konnopka Dr., Hans-Helmut König Prof., Claudia Kaufmann Dr., Nina Egger Dr., Beate Wild Prof., Joachim Szecsenyi Prof., Wolfgang Herzog Prof., Dieter Schellberg Dipl.-Psych., Rainer Schaefert PD
E-Jahr:2016
Jahr:1 September 2016
Umfang:8 S.
Teil:volume:90
 year:2016
 supplement:Supplement C
 pages:43-50
 extent:8
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 27.11.2017
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Journal of psychosomatic research
Ort Quelle:Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1956
Jahr Quelle:2016
Band/Heft Quelle:90(2016), Supplement C, Seite 43-50
ISSN Quelle:1879-1360
Abstract:Collaborative group intervention (CGI) in patients with functional somatic syndromes (FSS) has been shown to improve mental quality of life. To analyse incremental cost-utility of CGI compared to enhanced medical care in patients with FSS. An economic evaluation alongside a cluster-randomised controlled trial was performed. 35 general practitioners (GPs) recruited 300 FSS patients. Patients in the CGI arm were offered 10 group sessions within 3months and 2 booster sessions 6 and 12months after baseline. Costs were assessed via questionnaire. Quality adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated using the SF-6D index, derived from the 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). We calculated patients' net-monetary-benefit (NMB), estimated the treatment effect via regression, and generated cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. Using intention-to-treat analysis, total costs during the 12-month study period were 5777EUR in the intervention, and 6858EUR in the control group. Controlling for possible confounders, we found a small, but significant positive intervention effect on QALYs (+0.017; p=0.019) and an insignificant cost saving resulting from a cost-increase in the control group (−10.5%; p=0.278). NMB regression showed that the probability of CGI to be cost-effective was 69% for a willingness to pay (WTP) of 0EUR/QALY, increased to 92% for a WTP of 50,000EUR/QALY and reached the level of 95% at a WTP of 70,375EUR/QALY. Subgroup analyses yielded that CGI was only cost-effective in severe somatic symptom severity (PHQ-15≥15). CGI has a high probability to be a cost-effective treatment for FSS, in particular for patients with severe somatic symptom severity.
DOI:doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2016.09.001
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext ; Verlag: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2016.09.001
 Volltext: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399916303828
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2016.09.001
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:Collaborative care
 Cost-effectiveness
 Functional somatic syndromes
K10plus-PPN:1565724534
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68194665   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang