Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Belle, Sebastian [VerfasserIn]   i
 Sold, Moritz [VerfasserIn]   i
 Mack, Susanne [VerfasserIn]   i
 Pilz, Lothar R. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Ebert, Matthias [VerfasserIn]   i
 Kähler, Georg [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Submucosal injection with waterjet improves endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal adenoma
Titelzusatz:a randomised controlled clinical trial
Verf.angabe:Sebastian Belle, Manuel von Boscamp, Moritz Sold, Susanne Mack, Lothar Pilz, Matthias Ebert, Georg Kaehler
Jahr:2017
Jahr des Originals:2016
Umfang:6 S.
Fussnoten:Published online: 31 Oct 2016 ; Gesehen am 29.03.2018
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology
Ort Quelle:Abingdon : Taylor & Francis Group, 1966
Jahr Quelle:2017
Band/Heft Quelle:52(2017), 2, Seite 222-227
ISSN Quelle:1502-7708
Abstract:Purpose: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of colorectal adenomas leads to a reduced incidence of, and mortality from, colorectal carcinoma. Large adenomas are especially difficult to resect. Submucosal injection is a key part of EMR, as it allows for complete resection and decreased complications. We previously demonstrated in both animal models and a clinical trial that a focussed fluid beam applied to the mucosa creates selective fluid cushions in the submucosa selective tissue elevation by pressure (STEP). In this study, we examined the potential of this new technique compared to the standard inject and cut technique.Methods: This was a monocentric prospective two armed randomised controlled clinical trial comparing the STEP technique to the standard needle injection. We included patients with Yamada I and II adenomas ≥12 mm.Results: One hundred fifty-five patients were treated in the trial. With the STEP technique there was a significantly higher rate of en-bloc resection, whereas piecemeal resection was more common in the standard arm. The odds ratio of piecemeal resection was 2.422 with a 95% confidence interval of 1.163-5.045 (p value .0195). There was no significant difference in resection time between the two techniques, while there was a significant difference in resections speed for the STEP technique. There was also no difference in complication rates.Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the new STEP technique leads to a higher rate of en-bloc resections than the standard injection technique in endoscopic mucosa resection of colorectal adenomas. The STEP technique can play an important role in the future of EMR.
DOI:doi:10.1080/00365521.2016.1246606
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2016.1246606
 Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2016.1246606
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2016.1246606
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:Adenoma
 colonic polypectomy
 colonic polyps
 EMR
 en bloc resection
 endoscopic mucosa resection
 randomised clinical trial
K10plus-PPN:1571622012
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68237697   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang