Intraoperative assessment of reduction and implant placement in acetabular fractures - limitations of 3D-imaging compared to computed tomography

• Verfasst von: Keil, Holger [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Beisemann, Nils [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Schnetzke, Marc [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Vetter, Sven Y. [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Swartman, Benedict [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Grützner, Paul Alfred [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Franke, Jochen [VerfasserIn]
• Titel: Intraoperative assessment of reduction and implant placement in acetabular fractures - limitations of 3D-imaging compared to computed tomography
• Verf.angabe: Holger Keil, Nils Beisemann, Marc Schnetzke, Sven Yves Vetter, Benedict Swartman, Paul Alfred Grützner and Jochen Franke
• E-Jahr: 2018
• Jahr: 10 April 2018
• Fussnoten: Gesehen am 26.04.2018
• Titel Quelle: Enthalten in: Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research
• Ort Quelle: London : Biomed Central, 2006
• Jahr Quelle: 2018
• Band/Heft Quelle: 13(2018) Artikel-Nummer 78, 7 Seiten
• ISSN Quelle: 1749-799X
• DOI: doi:10.1186/s13018-018-0780-7
• Datenträger: Online-Ressource
• Sprache: eng
• Sach-SW: Acetabular fracture
• Sach-SW: Computed tomography
• Sach-SW: Intraoperative 3D imaging
• Sach-SW: Trauma
• K10plus-PPN: 1572420642
• K10plus-PPN:
  Universitätsbibliothek
• Lokale URL UB: Zum Volltext

Abstract

In acetabular fractures, the assessment of reduction and implant placement has limitations in conventional 2D intraoperative imaging. 3D imaging offers the opportunity to acquire CT-like images and thus to improve the results. However, clinical experience shows that even 3D imaging has limitations, especially regarding artifacts when implants are placed. The purpose of this study was to assess the difference between intraoperative 3D imaging and postoperative CT regarding reduction and implant placement.