Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Hennigs, André [VerfasserIn]   i
 Heil, Jörg [VerfasserIn]   i
 Golatta, Michael [VerfasserIn]   i
 Fastner, Sarah [VerfasserIn]   i
 Riedel, Fabian [VerfasserIn]   i
 Rauch, Geraldine [VerfasserIn]   i
 Feißt, Manuel [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Development and psychometric validation of a shorter version of the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS-12)
Verf.angabe:André Hennigs, Jörg Heil, Annette Wagner, Michelle Rath, Helfried Moosbrugger, Augustin Kelava, Michael Golatta, Sarah Hug, Fabian Riedel, Geraldine Rauch, Manuel Feißt
E-Jahr:2018
Jahr:4 January 2018
Umfang:8 S.
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 07.05.2018
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: The breast
Ort Quelle:Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1992
Jahr Quelle:2018
Band/Heft Quelle:38(2018), Seite 58-65
ISSN Quelle:1532-3080
Abstract:Objectives: Aesthetic and functional outcomes after oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (BCS) are directly related to the patients' quality of life (QoL). The Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS) is a validated but burdensome questionnaire for the assessment of these outcomes. The aim of the study was to strengthen and focus the BCTOS instrument by reducing the number of items and subscales without loss of information and validity. Methods: This study used a dataset of 871 patients with stage 0 - III breast cancer, from a prospective cohort study, who underwent BCS. We investigated correlations and other criteria of homogeneity of the BCTOS items to identify redundancies. An exploratory factor analysis was used to remodel the item-factor structure. Correlation and linear regression analysis with validated QoL subscales assessed the convergent and discriminant validity of the modified BCTOS structure. Results: The factor analysis revealed two distinct subscales for aesthetic and functional outcomes. It was possible to reduce the 22 items of the original BCTOS to 12 items, thus the “BCTOS-12”. The two new scales had very good internal consistency: Cronbach's α = 0.86 for the new Aesthetic Status subscale and α = 0.81 for the new Functional Status subscale. Bootstrapping confirmed the item-factor structure for all 10,000 samples, remarkably. Conclusion: The modified BCTOS questionnaire with only 12 items (BCTOS-12) is shorter, easier to interpret, and shows good validity.
DOI:doi:10.1016/j.breast.2017.12.002
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

kostenfrei registrierungspflichtig: Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2017.12.002
 kostenfrei registrierungspflichtig: Volltext: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977617307841
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2017.12.002
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:Aesthetic and functional results
 Breast conserving surgery
 BreastCancer Treatment Outcome Scale
 Patient-related outcomes
 Quality of life
K10plus-PPN:157401286X
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68250006   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang