Neue SEPSIS-3-Definition

• Verfasst von: Schmoch, Thomas [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Uhle, Florian [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Brenner, Thorsten [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Weigand, Markus A. [VerfasserIn]
• Titel: Neue SEPSIS-3-Definition
• Titelzusatz: Müssen wir Sepsis in Zukunft behandeln, bevor wir sie diagnostizieren dürfen?
• Paralleltitel: New Sepsis-3 definition: Do we have to treat sepsis before we can diagnose it from now on?
• Verf.angabe: T. Schmoch, M. Bernhard, F. Uhle, M. Gründling, T. Brenner, M.A. Weigand
• Jahr: 2017
• Umfang: 8 S.
• Fussnoten: First online: 11 May 2017 ; Gesehen am 15.06.2018
• Titel Quelle: Enthalten in: Der Anaesthesist
• Ort Quelle: Berlin : Springer, 1994
• Jahr Quelle: 2017
• Band/Heft Quelle: 66(2017), 8, Seite 614-621
• ISSN Quelle: 1432-055X
• DOI: doi:10.1007/s00101-017-0316-2
• Datenträger: Online-Ressource
• Sprache: ger eng
• K10plus-PPN: 1576391973

Abstract

The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) have been available since the beginning of 2016. SEPSIS-3 completely replaces the old SIRS criteria in the definition of sepsis and defines sepsis from now on as “life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection”. However, it seems questionable whether in clinical practice the new definition is really superior to the old one. The most important question is the following: Is it helpful to have a definition that first recognizes a patient once organ dysfunction has occurred and the patient already needs intensive care?