Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Trevisan, Maria T.S. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Owen, Robert [VerfasserIn]   i
 Breuer, Andrea [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Pesticide analysis in coffee leaves using a quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe approach and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry
Titelzusatz:optimization of the clean-up step
Verf.angabe:Maria Teresa Salles Trevisan, Robert Wyn Owen, Pau Calatayud-Vernich, Andrea Breuer, Yolanda Picó
Jahr:2017
Umfang:9 S.
Fussnoten:Available online 11 July 2017 ; Gesehen am 21.06.2018
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Journal of chromatography / A
Ort Quelle:New York, NY [u.a.] : Science Direct, 1958
Jahr Quelle:2017
Band/Heft Quelle:1512(2017), Seite 98-106
ISSN Quelle:1873-3778
Abstract:An analytical method using a quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe (QuEChERS) procedure for multi-residue determination of 52 pesticides in coffee leaf extractshas been developed and validated according to SANTE/11945/2015 guidelines. Different sorbent combinations for dispersive solid phase extraction (d-SPE) clean-up as well as dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) were tested. The relative standard deviations (RSDs) for the recovery of 87-94% of pesticides added to coffee leaf extracts,was ≤20% for samples spiked at concentrations up to 50ng*g−1 depending on the clean-up procedures. However, samples spiked with a 100ng*g−1 pesticide mixture gave RSDs>20% for most pesticides when d-SPE was carried out adding Supelclean ENVI-Carb 120/400. To explain this fact,the secondary metabolic profile was analyzed in all the extraction and clean-up procedures. Only in the clean-up procedure with the addition of Supel QuE Z-Sep+, does caffeine show a constant adsorption between blank and spiked samples. In other clean-up procedures, the amount of caffeine was higher in those samples spiked with pesticides. This indicates competition between caffeine and pesticides for adsorption to the sorbent. Addition of Supel QuE Z-Sep+ to the procedure revealed only a 32% matrix effect, whereas using PSA+ C18 the matrix effect was close to 97%. The process efficiency is up to 54% with the addition of Supel QuE Z-Sep+ and just up to 7% for the other clean-up procedures. The method was successfully tested in coffee leaves from different types of cultivars. Pesticides were not detected in organic coffee leaf extracts, but thiametoxan was clearly detected in 50% of coffee leaf extracts harvested from coffee trees grown under traditional conditions as determined by UHPLC-TOFMSLC/QqTOF-MS/MS.
DOI:doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2017.07.033
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext ; Verlag: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2017.07.033
 Volltext: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021967317310166
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2017.07.033
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:Coffee leaves
 Dispersive solid-phase clean-up
 Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry
 Matrix co-extractives
 Pesticides
 QuEChERS
K10plus-PPN:1576730395
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68263879   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang