Accuracy assessment for navigated maxillo-facial surgery using an electromagnetic tracking device

• Verfasst von: Seeberger, Robin [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Kane, Gavin J. [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Hoffmann, Jürgen [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Eggers, Georg [VerfasserIn]
• Titel: Accuracy assessment for navigated maxillo-facial surgery using an electromagnetic tracking device
• Verf.angabe: Robin Seeberger, Gavin Kane, Juergen Hoffmann, Georg Eggers
• Jahr: 2012
• Jahr des Originals: 2011
• Umfang: 6 S.
• Fussnoten: Published online: 1 April 2011 ; Gesehen am 27.06.2018
• Titel Quelle: Enthalten in: Journal of cranio-maxillofacial surgery
• Ort Quelle: Oxford [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1987
• Jahr Quelle: 2012
• Band/Heft Quelle: 40(2012), 2, Seite 156-161
• ISSN Quelle: 1878-4119
• DOI: doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2011.03.003
• Datenträger: Online-Ressource
• Sprache: eng
• Sach-SW: Electromagnetic tracing
• Sach-SW: Image guided surgery
• Sach-SW: Maxillo-facial surgery
• Sach-SW: Navigation
• K10plus-PPN: 1576888118

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy and the usability of an electromagnetic tracking device in maxillo-facial surgery through testing on a phantom skull under operating room (OR) conditions. Material and methods. A standard plastic skull phantom was equipped with a custom made model of the maxilla and with target markers and dental brackets. Imaging was performed with a computed tomography (CT) scanner. The extent and robustness of the electromagnetic tracking system’s target registration error (TRE) was evaluated under various conditions. Results: For each measurement a total of 243 registrations were performed with 5 point registration and 4374 registrations with 6 point registration. The average target registration error for the 5 point registration under OR conditions was 2.1mm (SD 0.86) and 1.03 (SD 0.53) for the 6 point registration. Metallic instruments applied to the skull increased the TRE significantly in both registration methods. Conclusion: The electromagnetic tracking device showed a high accuracy and performed stable in both registration methods. Electromagnetic interference due to metallic instruments was significant but the extent of TRE was still acceptable in comparison to optical navigation devices. A benefit of EM tracking is the absence of line-of-sight hindrance. The test setting simulating OR conditions has proven suitable for further studies.