Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Eisenacher, Sarah [VerfasserIn]   i
 Zink, Mathias [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Holding on to false beliefs
Titelzusatz:the bias against disconfirmatory evidence over the course of psychosis
Verf.angabe:Sarah Eisenacher, Mathias Zink
Jahr:2017
Jahr des Originals:2016
Umfang:11 S.
Fussnoten:Available online 30 August 2016 ; Gesehen am 09.07.2018
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry
Ort Quelle:Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1970
Jahr Quelle:2017
Band/Heft Quelle:56(2017), Seite 79-89
ISSN Quelle:1873-7943
Abstract:Background and Objectives: The ability to integrate evidence into a reasoning process is crucial in order to react to changing information, e.g. to adapt one's beliefs according to new evidence or to generate new beliefs when facing better alternatives. Evidence integration ability is thus associated with belief flexibility. A specific bias of evidence integration, a bias against disconfirmatory evidence (BADE), can be found in patients with schizophrenia and has been linked to delusion development and maintenance. Knowledge about whether the BADE occurs already in risk constellations of psychosis can clarify its role in the pathogenesis of psychosis. Methods: This article reviews the current literature on BADE. Many studies demonstrate BADE over the course of illness, ranging from healthy controls with subclinical properties of schizotypy, over patients with at-risk mental states (ARMS) and patients with a first episode of psychosis to patients with chronic schizophrenia. These data allow a comparison of competences and deficits over the course of illness. Underlying mechanisms of BADE are discussed, including interrelations with neurocognitive performance and dopaminergic processes. Results: The BADE could be found in different phases of psychosis development and can be regarded as a cognitive marker of the beginning psychotic state. Limitations: The presented findings are derived from independent cross-sectional studies. So far, no comprehensive longitudinal assessment has been published. Conclusions: Treatments of metacognitive deficits in general and as early as in the ARMS might interfere with the cognitive pathogenesis of psychosis, and thereby ameliorate, postpone or even prevent the transition to psychosis.
DOI:doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2016.08.015
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2016.08.015
 Volltext: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005791616300891
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2016.08.015
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:Belief flexibility
 Bias against disconfirmatory evidence
 Evidence integration
 Psychosis
 Schizophrenia
K10plus-PPN:1577427750
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68283643   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang