Deformational plagiocephaly in normal infants

• Verfasst von: Bock, Freia de [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Braun, Volker [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Renz-Polster, Herbert [VerfasserIn]
• Titel: Deformational plagiocephaly in normal infants
• Titelzusatz: a systematic review of causes and hypotheses
• Verf.angabe: Freia De Bock, Volker Braun, Herbert Renz-Polster
• E-Jahr: 2017
• Jahr: 19 January 2017
• Umfang: 8 S.
• Fussnoten: Published online first 19 January 2017 ; Gesehen am 21.08.2018
• Titel Quelle: Enthalten in: Archives of disease in childhood
• Ort Quelle: London : BMJ Publ. Group, 1926
• Jahr Quelle: 2017
• Band/Heft Quelle: 102(2017), 6, Seite 535-542
• ISSN Quelle: 1468-2044
• DOI: doi:10.1136/archdischild-2016-312018
• Datenträger: Online-Ressource
• Sprache: eng
• K10plus-PPN: 1580248292

Abstract

Background Deformational plagiocephaly (DP) is one of the most prevalent abnormal findings in infants and a frequent reason for parents to seek paediatric advice. Objective To systematically review the literature and identify evidence and hypotheses on the aetiology and determinants of DP in otherwise healthy infants. Design Systematic keyword search in all major biomedical databases to identify peer-reviewed publications reporting (a) empirical research or (b) hypotheses on the aetiology of DP in healthy, term infants. 3150 studies published between 1985 and 2016 and containing relevant keywords were screened. In a two-pronged approach, results were summarised separately for the body of empirical work (22 studies) and the body of hypotheses (110 articles). Review findings Only a few empirical studies have examined risk factors in non-selected patient populations on a higher grade methodological level. The most commonly reported risk factors were: male gender, supine sleep position, limited neck rotation or preference in head position, first-born child, lower level of activity and lack of tummy time. Agreement between empirical studies was poor for most exposures, including supine sleep position, tummy time and use of car seats. The articles reporting hypotheses on the aetiology of DP cover a wide field of environmental and biological factors, but include little suggestions as to the potential influence of the everyday care environment of the baby. Conclusions and relevance The evidence on the aetiology of DP is fragmentary and heterogeneous. In addition, factors possibly relevant to the development of DP have not been appreciated in the scientific discussion.