Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Kriegsmann, Katharina [VerfasserIn]   i
 Bärtsch, Marc-Andrea [VerfasserIn]   i
 Bruckner, Thomas [VerfasserIn]   i
 Kriegsmann, Mark [VerfasserIn]   i
 Schmitt, Anita [VerfasserIn]   i
 Witzens-Harig, Mathias [VerfasserIn]   i
 Ho, Anthony Dick [VerfasserIn]   i
 Hillengaß, Jens [VerfasserIn]   i
 Wuchter, Patrick [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Comparison of biosimilar filgrastim, originator filgrastim, and lenograstim for autologous stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma
Verf.angabe:Katharina Lisenko, Marc-Andrea Baertsch, Renate Meiser, Petra Pavel, Thomas Bruckner, Mark Kriegsmann, Anita Schmitt, Mathias Witzens‐Harig, Anthony D. Ho, Jens Hillengass, and Patrick Wuchter
E-Jahr:2017
Jahr:October 2017
Umfang:7 S.
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 28.08.2018
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Transfusion
Ort Quelle:Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1961
Jahr Quelle:2017
Band/Heft Quelle:57(2017), 10, Seite 2359-2365
ISSN Quelle:1537-2995
Abstract:Background: Granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) originators such as filgrastim (Neupogen) and lenograstim (Granocyte) are widely used for peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization. In recent years, biosimilar agents have been approved for the same indications. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the mobilization efficiency of the three G-CSF variants originator filgrastim, lenograstim, and the biosimilar Filgrastim Hexal in a homogeneous group of multiple myeloma (MM) patients in first-line therapy. Study design and methods: Overall mobilization data of 250 patients with MM were included. Of these patients, 74 (30%), 131 (52%), and 45 (18%) were mobilized with originator filgrastim, biosimilar Filgrastim Hexal, or lenograstim, respectively, at a dose of 5 to 10 µg/kg body weight subcutaneously starting from Day 5 after chemomobilization with CAD (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, dexamethasone) until completion of PBSC collection. Results: All but one patient reached the collection goal of a minimum of at least 2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg body weight during a median of one (range, one to three) leukapheresis session. No significant differences in CD34+ mobilization and collection yields between the filgrastim-mobilized (median, 10.5; range, 2.7-40.4), Filgrastim Hexal-mobilized (median, 9.9; range, 0.2-26.0), and lenograstim-mobilized (median, 10.7; range, 3.1-27.9 CD34+ cells × 106/kg body weight) patients were observed. Conclusion: Concerning the clinically relevant efficiencies of PBSC mobilization and in terms of reaching the individual collection target, this retrospective study did not detect any significant differences between the three G-CSF variants in the analyzed patient cohort.
DOI:doi:10.1111/trf.14211
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/trf.14211
 Volltext: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/trf.14211
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.14211
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
K10plus-PPN:1580476724
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68299634   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang