Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Honeck, Patrick [VerfasserIn]   i
 Kienle, Peter [VerfasserIn]   i
 Younsi, Nina [VerfasserIn]   i
 Thüroff, Joachim W. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Stein, Raimund [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Adenocarcinoma in continent anal urinary diversion
Titelzusatz:is a sigma rectum pouch a surgical option after failed ureterosigmoidostomy?
Verf.angabe:Patrick Honeck, Peter Kienle, Nina Huck, Andreas Neisius, Joachim Thüroff, Raimund Stein
E-Jahr:2017
Jahr:18 January 2017
Umfang:5 S.
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 29.08.2018
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Urology
Ort Quelle:Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1973
Jahr Quelle:2017
Band/Heft Quelle:103(2017), Seite 209-213
ISSN Quelle:1527-9995
Abstract:Objective: To report our experience of radical resection of secondary cancers after ureterosigmoidostomy. Ureterosigmoidostomy was the most common continent urinary diversion before the era of continent cutaneous diversion and neobladders, specifically in children. When performed for bladder exstrophy, patients will live with this kind of diversion for quite a long time. As a result, urologists will be confronted with patients presenting with an adenocarcinoma in their ureterosigmoidostomy. In most cases reported in the literature, an ileal conduit was used for urinary conversion. However, nowadays an ileal loop must not be the only solution for patients with a long life expectancy. Materials and Methods: Between 2004 and 2015, 6 patients were treated for an adenocarcinoma in their ureterosigmoidostomy. All patients underwent radical resection of the tumor-bearing sigmoid colon. After thorough preoperative informed consent concerning the choice of future urinary diversion, such as conversion to an ileal conduit, construction of a continent catheterizable pouch, or repeat continent anal diversion, 4 patients chose a repeat continent anal urinary diversion. Results: Up to this date, no complications or recurrences were seen after a median follow-up of 35 months. Conclusion: In patients with secondary malignancy of the colon, radical resection of the tumor-bearing bowel segment is mandatory. A repeat continent anal urinary diversion appears to be a feasible alternative to secondary urinary diversion after resection of the tumor-bearing sigmoid colon. However, a longer follow-up is required to determine whether the risk of secondary malignancy remains unchanged, and whether the risk is increased or decreased.
DOI:doi:10.1016/j.urology.2017.01.013
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.01.013
 Volltext: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090429517300407
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.01.013
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
K10plus-PPN:158048820X
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68299955   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang