Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Abou-Alfa, Ghassan K. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Ganten, Tom M. [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Phase II study of first‐line trebananib plus sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
Verf.angabe:Ghassan K. Abou‐Alfa, Jean-Frederic Blanc, Steven Miles, Tom Ganten, Jörg Trojan, Jonathan Cebon, Andre K. Liem, Lara Lipton, Charu Gupta, Benjamin Wu, Michael Bass, Ellen Hollywood, Jennifer Ma, Margaret Bradley, Jason Litten, Leonard B. Saltz
E-Jahr:2017
Jahr:June 7, 2017
Umfang:8 S.
Teil:volume:22
 year:2017
 number:7
 pages:780-781, e60-e65
 extent:8
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 26.09.2018
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: The oncologist
Ort Quelle:Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 1996
Jahr Quelle:2017
Band/Heft Quelle:22(2017), 7, Seite 780-781, e60-e65
ISSN Quelle:1549-490X
Abstract:Lessons Learned. Trebananib leveraging anti‐angiogenic mechanism that is distinct from the classic sorafenib anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition did not demonstrate improved progression‐free survival at 4 months in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In support of previously reported high Ang‐2 levels’ association with poor outcome in HCC for patients, trebananib treatment with lower baseline Ang‐2 at study entry was associated with improved overall survival to 22 months and may suggest future studies to be performed within the context of low baseline Ang‐2. Background. Ang‐1 and Ang‐2 are angiopoietins thought to promote neovascularization via activation of the Tie‐2 angiopoietin receptor. Trebananib sequesters Ang‐1 and Ang‐2, preventing interaction with the Tie‐2 receptor. Trebananib plus sorafenib combination has acceptable toxicity. Elevated Ang‐2 levels are associated with poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods. Patients with HCC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ≤2, and Childs‐Pugh A received IV trebananib at 10 mg/kg or 15 mg/kg weekly plus sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily. The study was planned for ≥78% progression‐free survival (PFS) rate at 4 months relative to 62% for sorafenib historical control (power = 80% α = 0.20). Secondary endpoints included safety, tolerability, overall survival (OS), and multiple biomarkers, including serum Ang‐2. Results. Thirty patients were enrolled sequentially in each of the two nonrandomized cohorts. Demographics were comparable between the two arms and the historical controls. PFS rates at 4 months were 57% and 54% on the 10 mg/kg and 15 mg/kg trebananib cohorts, respectively. Median OS was 17 and 11 months, respectively. Grade 3 and above events noted in ≥10% of patients included fatigue, hypertension, diarrhea, liver failure, palmar‐plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome, dyspnea, and hypophosphatemia. One death was due to hepatic failure. Serum Ang‐2 dichotomized at the median was associated with improved OS in both cohorts. Conclusion. There was no improvement in PFS rate at 4 months in either cohort, when compared with sorafenib historical control.
DOI:doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0058
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext ; Verlag: http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0058
 Volltext: http://theoncologist.alphamedpress.org/content/22/7/780
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0058
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
K10plus-PPN:1581308051
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68309229   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang