Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Kälble, Tilman [VerfasserIn]   i
 Alken, Peter [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Sekundärmalignome in Harnableitungen
Verf.angabe:T. Kälble, I. Hofmann, J.W. Thüroff, R. Stein, R. Hautmann, H. Riedmiller, D. Vergho, L. Hertle, C. Wülfing, M. Truß, S. Roth, F.C. von Rundstedt, P. Albers, J. Gschwend, K. Herkommer, U. Humke, M. Spahn, P. Bader, J. Steffens, R. Harzmann, C.G. Stief, A. Karl, S.C. Müller, M. Waldner, J. Noldus, K. Kleinschmidt, P. Alken, B. Kopper, M. Fisch, A. Lampel, A. Stenzel, J. Fichtner, B. Flath, H. Rübben, K.P. Juenemann, S. Hautmann, A. Knipper, D. Leusmann, W. Strohmaier, W.F. Thon, S. Miller, K. Weingärtner, A. Schilling, H. Piechota, J.E. Becht, H. Schwaibold, P. Bub, S. Conrad, U. Wenderoth, W. Merkle, W. Rösch, T. Otto, B. Ulshöfer, M. Westenfelder
E-Jahr:2012
Jahr:April 2012
Umfang:7 S.
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 21.11.2018
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Der Urologe
Ort Quelle:[Berlin : Springer Medizin, 2007
Jahr Quelle:2012
Band/Heft Quelle:51(2012), 4, Seite 500-506
ISSN Quelle:1433-0563
Abstract:In contrast to ureterosigmoidostomy no reliable clinical data exist for tumor risk in different forms of urinary diversion using isolated intestinal segments.In 44 German urological departments, operation frequencies, indications, patient age, and operation dates of the different forms of urinary diversion, operated between 1970 and 2007, could be registered. The secondary tumors up to 2009 were registered as well and related to the numbers of the different forms of urinary diversions resulting in tumor prevalences.In 17,758 urinary diversions 32 secondary tumors occurred. The tumor risk in ureterosigmoidostomy (22-fold) and cystoplasty (13-fold) is significantly higher than in other continent forms of urinary diversion such as neobladders or pouches (p<0.0001). The difference between ureterosigmoidostomy and cystoplasty is not significant, nor is the difference between ileocecal pouches (0.14%) and ileal neobladders (0.05%) (p=0.46). The tumor risk in ileocecal (1.26%) and colonic neobladders (1.43%) is significantly higher (p=0.0001) than in ileal neobladders (0.5%). Of the 16 tumors that occurred following ureterosigmoidostomy, 16 (94%) developed directly at the ureterocolonic borderline in contrast to only 50% following urinary diversions via isolated intestinal segments.From postoperative year 5 regular endoscopic controls of ureterosigmoidostomies, cystoplasties, and orthotopic (ileo-)colonic neobladders are necessary. In ileocecal pouches, regular endoscopy is necessary at least in the presence of symptoms or should be performed routinely at greater intervals. Following neobladders or conduits, only urethroscopies for urethral recurrence are necessary.
DOI:doi:10.1007/s00120-012-2815-8
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext ; Verlag: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00120-012-2815-8
 Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-012-2815-8
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-012-2815-8
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:ger
Sach-SW:Darmsegmente
 Harnableitung
 Intestinal segments
 Secondary tumor
 Sekundäre Tumore
 Ureterosigmoideostomie
 Ureterosigmoidostomy
 Urinary diversion
K10plus-PPN:1583921257
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68330855   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang