Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Livingstone, Elisabeth [VerfasserIn]   i
 Utikal, Jochen [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Prospective evaluation of follow-up in melanoma patients in Germany
Titelzusatz:results of a multicentre and longitudinal study
Verf.angabe:E. Livingstone, C. Krajewski, T.K. Eigentler, C. Windemuth-Kieselbach, S. Benson, S. Elsenbruch, A. Hauschild, R. Rompel, F. Meiss, A. Mauerer, K.C. Kähler, E. Dippel, K. Möllenhoff, K. Kilian, P. Mohr, J. Utikal, D. Schadendorf
E-Jahr:2015
Jahr:28 January 2015
Umfang:15 S.
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 03.12.2018
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: European journal of cancer
Ort Quelle:Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1992
Jahr Quelle:2015
Band/Heft Quelle:51(2015), 5, Seite 653-667
ISSN Quelle:1879-0852
Abstract:Background: Patient numbers requiring long-term melanoma surveillance are constantly rising. Surveillance is costly and guideline recommendations vary substantially. Methods: In this German nationwide study, information on surveillance and treatment of patients diagnosed with melanoma and melanoma in situ (MMis) between April and June 2008 was prospectively collected over four years. Additionally, patient self-report questionnaires were evaluated to assess anxiety, depression, health-related quality of life, socio-demographic information and use of disease specific health information sources at year 4 after primary diagnosis. Results: Complete data was available for 668 patients from 67 centres, of whom 96.0% were in regular melanoma surveillance. In year 3-4 of surveillance, only 55.6% of locoregionary metastases were detected during surveillance visits. Only 33.3% were self-detected by the patient even though 69.4% were documented as being clinically visible or palpable. Costs of 4year surveillance of 550 patients without tumour recurrence (stage I-IIC and MMis) accumulated to 228,155.75 €. Guideline-adherence for follow-up frequency, lymph node ultrasound, S100 serum level tests and diagnostic imaging recommendations was approximately 60% in year 3-4 of surveillance. Multivariate regression analysis showed that certain patient/tumour characteristics and regional differences were significantly associated with guideline deviations. The percentage of patients who exceeded published cut-off scores indicating clinically relevant symptoms of anxiety and depression were significantly increased. Patients frequently reported lack of psychosocial support and education but ascribed great importance to these. Conclusions: We recommend further reduction of melanoma follow-up in low-risk melanoma patients and improvement of psycho-social support and patient education for all melanoma patients.
DOI:doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2015.01.007
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2015.01.007
 Volltext: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959804915000155
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2015.01.007
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:Cost-effectiveness
 Costs
 Follow-up
 Guideline
 Melanoma
 Patient education
 Psychosocial support
 Recurrence
 Surveillance
K10plus-PPN:1584699132
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68334902   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang