Socioeconomic differences and lung cancer survival

• Verfasst von: Finke, Isabelle [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Behrens, Gundula [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Weißer, Linda [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Brenner, Hermann [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Jansen, Lina [VerfasserIn]
• Titel: Socioeconomic differences and lung cancer survival
• Titelzusatz: systematic review and meta-analysis
• Verf.angabe: Isabelle Finke, Gundula Behrens, Linda Weisser, Hermann Brenner and Lina Jansen
• E-Jahr: 2018
• Jahr: 27 November 2018
• Umfang: 20 S.
• Fussnoten: Gesehen am 04.02.2019
• Titel Quelle: Enthalten in: Frontiers in oncology
• Ort Quelle: Lausanne : Frontiers Media, 2011
• Jahr Quelle: 2018
• Band/Heft Quelle: 8(2018), Artikel-ID 536, Seite 1-20
• ISSN Quelle: 2234-943X
• DOI: doi:10.3389/fonc.2018.00536
• Datenträger: Online-Ressource
• Sprache: eng
• Sach-SW: Area-based
• Sach-SW: cancer survival
• Sach-SW: Education
• Sach-SW: Income
• Sach-SW: index
• Sach-SW: lung cancer
• Sach-SW: Occupation
• Sach-SW: socioeconomic status (SES)
• K10plus-PPN: 1587230011

Abstract

Background: The impact of socioeconomic differences on cancer survival has been investigated for several cancer types showing lower cancer survival in patients from lower socioeconomic groups. However, little is known about the relation between the strength of association and the level of adjustment and level of aggregation of the socioeconomic status measure. Here, we conduct the first systematic review and meta-analysis on the association of individual and area-based measures of socioeconomic status with lung cancer survival. Methods: In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, we searched for studies on socioeconomic differences in lung cancer survival in four electronic databases. A study was included if it reported a measure of survival in relation to education, income, occupation or composite measures (indices). If possible, meta-analyses were conducted for studies reporting on individual and area-based socioeconomic measures. Results: We included 94 studies in the review, of which 23 measured socioeconomic status on an individual level and 71 on an area-based level. Seventeen studies were eligible to be included in the meta-analyses. The meta-analyses revealed a poorer prognosis for patients with low individual income (pooled hazard ratio: 1.13, 95% confidence interval: 1.08-1.19, reference: high income), but not for individual education. Group comparisons for hazard ratios of area-based studies indicated a poorer prognosis for lower socioeconomic groups, irrespective of the socioeconomic measure. In most studies, reported one-, three- and five-year survival rates across socioeconomic status groups showed decreasing rates with decreasing socioeconomic status for both individual and area-based measures. We cannot confirm a consistent relationship between level of aggregation and effect size, however, comparability across studies was hampered by heterogeneous reporting of socioeconomic status and survival measures. Only eight studies considered smoking status in the analysis. Conclusions: Our findings suggest a weak positive association between individual income and lung cancer survival. Studies reporting on socioeconomic differences in lung cancer survival should consider including smoking status of the patients in their analysis and to stratify by relevant prognostic factors to further explore the reasons for socioeconomic differences. A common definition for socioeconomic status measures is desirable to further enhance comparisons between nations and across different levels of aggregation.