Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Moll, Guido [VerfasserIn]   i
 Bieback, Karen [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Cryopreserved or fresh mesenchymal stromal cells
Titelzusatz:only a matter of taste or key to unleash the full clinical potential of MSC therapy?
Verf.angabe:Guido Moll, Sven Geißler, Rusan Catar, Lech Ignatowicz, Martin J. Hoogduijn, Dirk Strunk, Karen Bieback, Olle Ringdén
E-Jahr:2016
Jahr:12 November 2016
Umfang:22 S.
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 13.02.2019 ; First Online 12 November 2016
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Biobanking and cryopreservation of stem cells
Ort Quelle:Cham : Springer, 2016
Jahr Quelle:2016
Band/Heft Quelle:(2016), Seite 77-98
ISBN Quelle:978-3-319-45457-3
Abstract:Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) harbor great therapeutic potential for numerous diseases. From early clinical trials, success and failure analysis, bench-to-bedside and back-to-bench approaches, there has been a great gain in knowledge, still leaving a number of questions to be answered regarding optimal manufacturing and quality of MSCs for clinical application. For treatment of many acute indications, cryobanking may remain a prerequisite, but great uncertainty exists considering the therapeutic value of freshly thawed (thawed) and continuously cultured (fresh) MSCs. The field has seen an explosion of new literature lately, outlining the relevance of the topic. MSCs appear to have compromised immunomodulatory activity directly after thawing for clinical application. This may provide a possible explanation for failure of early clinical trials. It is not clear if and how quickly MSCs recover their full therapeutic activity, and if the “cryo stun effect” is relevant for clinical success. Here, we will share our latest insights into the relevance of these observations for clinical practice that will be discussed in the context of the published literature. We argue that the differences of fresh and thawed MSCs are limited but significant. A key issue in evaluating potency differences is the time point of analysis after thawing. To date, prospective double-blinded randomized clinical studies to evaluate potency of both products are lacking, although recent progress was made with preclinical assessment. We suggest refocusing therapeutic MSC development on potency and safety assays with close resemblance of the clinical reality.
DOI:doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45457-3_7
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45457-3_7
 Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45457-3_7
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45457-3_7
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:Cell engraftment
 Cell therapy
 Coagulation
 Complement
 Cryopreservation
 Cryopreservation-induced cell death
 Freeze injury
 Freeze-thawing
 Mesenchymal stromal cell
 T cells
K10plus-PPN:158761944X
Verknüpfungen:→ Sammelwerk

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68358325   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang