Social preferences under chronic stress

• Verfasst von: Ceccato, Smarandita [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Kettner, Sara Elisa [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Schwieren, Christiane [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Voß, Andreas [VerfasserIn]
• Titel: Social preferences under chronic stress
• Verf.angabe: Smarandita Ceccato, Sara E. Kettner, Brigitte M. Kudielka, Christiane Schwieren, Andreas Voss
• E-Jahr: 2018
• Jahr: July 18, 2018
• Illustrationen: Diagramme
• Teil: volume:13
• Teil: year:2018
• Teil: number:7
• Fussnoten: Gesehen am 02.04.2019
• Titel Quelle: Enthalten in: PLOS ONE
• Ort Quelle: San Francisco, California, US : PLOS, 2006
• Jahr Quelle: 2018
• Band/Heft Quelle: 13(2018,7) Artikel-Nummer e0199528, Seite 1-16, 16 Seiten
• ISSN Quelle: 1932-6203
• DOI: doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0199528
• Datenträger: Online-Ressource
• Sprache: eng
• Sach-SW: Anxiety
• Sach-SW: Behavior
• Sach-SW: Decision making
• Sach-SW: Dictator game
• Sach-SW: Prosocial behavior
• Sach-SW: Psychological stress
• Sach-SW: Psychometrics
• Sach-SW: Regression analysis
• K10plus-PPN: 1662720122

Abstract

Even though chronic stress is a pervasive problem in contemporary societies and is known to potentially precede both adverse psychological as well as physiological conditions, its effects on decision making have not been systematically investigated. In this paper, we focus on the relation between self-reported chronic stress and self-reported as well as behaviorally shown social preferences. We measured chronic stress with the Trier Inventory for Chronic Stress. To determine social preferences, participants played a double anonymous dictator game. In order to control for the robustness of social preferences we employed a 2x2x2x2 design where we manipulated four variables: the frame (Give to Recipient vs. Take from Recipient), the decision maker’s gender (Female vs. Male), the recipient’s gender (Female vs. Male), and the nature of the reward (Real vs. Hypothetical). Results show that perceived chronic stress is not significantly related to social preferences in monetarily rewarded dictator decisions for either gender. However, women’s displayed preferences for hypothetical rewards are negatively correlated to chronic stress levels. This indicates that higher chronic stress in women is associated with lower hypothetical transfers but not with altered actual behavior as compared to non-stressed women. For men, we do not observe such effects. Our findings suggest that, while chronic stress leaves social preferences unaffected in an incentive compatible task, it might foster what could be interpreted as a decrease in self-image promotion in women. Thus, we conclude that in a thoroughly controlled behavioral task differences in reported chronic stress do not entail differences in social preferences, but relate to variation in hypothetical decisions for women.