Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Ronellenfitsch, Ulrich [VerfasserIn]   i
 Hohenberger, Peter [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumors
Titelzusatz:state of the art of laparoscopic resection and surgery for M1 tumors
Verf.angabe:Ulrich Ronellenfitsch, Peter Hohenberger
E-Jahr:2018
Jahr:October 3, 2018
Umfang:8 S.
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 11.04.2019
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Visceral medicine
Ort Quelle:Basel : Karger, 2016
Jahr Quelle:2018
Band/Heft Quelle:34(2018), 5, Seite 367-374
ISSN Quelle:2297-475X
Abstract:Background: The principles of surgery for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) are resection with clear margins without lymphadenectomy, thus enabling organ-preserving resection in many cases. Tumor rupture needs to be avoided, because it entails peritoneal sarcomatosis. Given these preconditions, there is a rationale for laparoscopic resection of primary GIST. In metastatic GIST, surgery cannot achieve cure, but constitutes an important cornerstone of treatment. Resection can be performed either for residual lesions in responding patients, for focally progressive lesions, or as palliative measure in generalized progression. Methods: Selective literature review. Results: There is ample evidence on laparoscopic resection of gastric GIST, but none from randomized trials. The studies show favorable perioperative outcomes and suggest adequate oncological results; however, a direct comparison to open resection is difficult. For surgery in M1 stages, survival outcomes are better for resection in generalized response than in focal progression. Perioperative morbidity is acceptable. Surgery in generalized progression does not prolong survival and bears relevant morbidity risks. Conclusion: Laparoscopy seems an adequate surgical approach for primary gastric GIST, as long as the surgical principles relevant for this entity are respected. For other tumor sites, there is no sufficient evidence available. In M1 stages, selected patients may benefit from surgery. Survival differences between resection at different stages probably mirror the biology of the disease rather than the effect of the timing of the operation.
DOI:doi:10.1159/000491799
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1159/000491799
 Volltext: https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/491799
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000491799
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
K10plus-PPN:1663154368
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68380236   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang