Dental magnetic resonance imaging for periodontal indication

• Verfasst von: Rütters, Maurice [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Jürchott, Alexander [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Sayed, Nihad el [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Heiland, Sabine [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Bendszus, Martin [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Kim, Ti-Sun [VerfasserIn]
• Titel: Dental magnetic resonance imaging for periodontal indication
• Titelzusatz: a new approach of imaging residual periodontal bone support
• Verf.angabe: Maurice Ruetters, Alexander Juerchott, Nihad El Sayed, Sabine Heiland, Martin Bendszus & Ti-Sun Kim
• E-Jahr: 2019
• Jahr: 29 August 2018
• Umfang: 6 S.
• Fussnoten: Gesehen am 26.04.2019
• Titel Quelle: Enthalten in: Acta odontologica Scandinavica
• Ort Quelle: London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis Group, 1939
• Jahr Quelle: 2019
• Band/Heft Quelle: 77(2019), 1, Seite 49-54
• ISSN Quelle: 1502-3850
• DOI: doi:10.1080/00016357.2018.1499959
• Datenträger: Online-Ressource
• Sprache: eng
• Sach-SW: dental digital radiography
• Sach-SW: diagnostic imaging
• Sach-SW: Magnetic resonance imaging
• Sach-SW: periodontal attachment loss
• Sach-SW: periodontal disease
• Sach-SW: X-rays
• K10plus-PPN: 1663682518

Abstract

Objective: The standard imaging techniques used in dentistry consist of two-dimensional radiographic techniques like intraoral periapical (PA) radiographs, bitewings or extraoral panoramic X-rays. Three-dimensional methods, such as cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), are not standard procedures. In several fields of dentistry, such as oral surgery or implantology, dental magnetic resonance imaging (DMRI), a technique without radiation exposure, has already been introduced as a new promising diagnostic tool. The aim of this study was to compare the agreement of DMRI and PA radiographs in measuring residual periodontal bone support.Material and methods: In this study, the residual periodontal bone support of 21 teeth was investigated and compared with DMRI and PA radiographs by two independent raters. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated using the software R to identify the intra-rater and inter-rater agreement of the two modalities. Bland-Altman plots were created to directly compare the two methods.Results: Overall, all calculated ICC values showed an excellent intra-rater and inter-rater agreement (>0.9) for DMRI, as well as PA radiographs. Bland-Altman analysis also showed a strong agreement between both diagnostic methods in this study.Conclusions: In conclusion, there was a strong agreement between DMRI and PA. Thus, DMRI proved to be a comparable method to PA radiographs for evaluating the proportion of residual periodontal bone support.