Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Schnülle, Peter [VerfasserIn]   i
 Drüschler, Katharina [VerfasserIn]   i
 Schmitt, Wilhelm [VerfasserIn]   i
 Benck, Urs Tobias [VerfasserIn]   i
 Zeier, Martin [VerfasserIn]   i
 Krämer, Bernhard [VerfasserIn]   i
 Opelz, Gerhard [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Donor organ intervention before kidney transplantation
Titelzusatz:Head-to-head comparison of therapeutic hypothermia, machine perfusion, and donor dopamine pretreatment. What is the evidence?
Verf.angabe:Peter Schnuelle, Katharina Drüschler, Wilhelm H. Schmitt, Urs Benck, Martin Zeier, Bernhard K. Krämer, Gerhard Opelz
E-Jahr:2019
Jahr:[2019]
Jahr des Originals:2018
Umfang:9 S.
Fussnoten:First published: 31 July 2018 ; Gesehen am 10.05.2019
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: American journal of transplantation
Ort Quelle:[Amsterdam] : Elsevier, 2001
Jahr Quelle:2019
Band/Heft Quelle:19(2019), 4, Seite 975-983
ISSN Quelle:1600-6143
Abstract:Therapeutic hypothermia, hypothermic pulsatile machine perfusion (MP), and renal-dose dopamine administered to stable brain-dead donors have shown efficacy to reduce the dialysis requirement after kidney transplantation. In a head-to-head comparison of the three major randomized controlled trials in this field, we estimated the number-needed-to-treat for each method, evaluated costs and inquired into special features regarding long-term outcomes. The MP and hypothermia trials used any dialysis requirement during the first postoperative week, whereas the dopamine trial assessed >1 dialysis session as primary endpoint. Compared to controls, the respective rates declined by 5.7% with MP, 10.9% with hypothermia, and 10.7% with dopamine. Costs to prevent one endpoint in one recipient amount to approximately $17 000 with MP but are negligible with the donor interventions. MP resulted in a borderline significant difference of 4% in 3-year graft survival, but a point of interest is that the preservation method was switched in 25 donors (4.6%) for technical reasons. Graft survival was not improved with dopamine on intention-to-treat but suggested an exposure-response relationship with infusion time. MP was less efficacious and cost-effective to prevent posttransplant dialysis. Whether the benefit on early graft dysfunction achieved with any method will improve long-term graft survival remains to be established.
DOI:doi:10.1111/ajt.15317
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.15317
 Volltext: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ajt.15317
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.15317
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:clinical research/practice
 critical care/intensive care management
 delayed graft function (DGF)
 donors and donation: deceased
 kidney (allograft) function/dysfunction
 organ perfusion and preservation
 organ procurement and allocation
 organ transplantation in general
K10plus-PPN:1665099747
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68388647   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang