| Online-Ressource |
Verfasst von: | Schnülle, Peter [VerfasserIn]  |
| Drüschler, Katharina [VerfasserIn]  |
| Schmitt, Wilhelm [VerfasserIn]  |
| Benck, Urs Tobias [VerfasserIn]  |
| Zeier, Martin [VerfasserIn]  |
| Krämer, Bernhard [VerfasserIn]  |
| Opelz, Gerhard [VerfasserIn]  |
Titel: | Donor organ intervention before kidney transplantation |
Titelzusatz: | Head-to-head comparison of therapeutic hypothermia, machine perfusion, and donor dopamine pretreatment. What is the evidence? |
Verf.angabe: | Peter Schnuelle, Katharina Drüschler, Wilhelm H. Schmitt, Urs Benck, Martin Zeier, Bernhard K. Krämer, Gerhard Opelz |
E-Jahr: | 2019 |
Jahr: | [2019] |
Jahr des Originals: | 2018 |
Umfang: | 9 S. |
Fussnoten: | First published: 31 July 2018 ; Gesehen am 10.05.2019 |
Titel Quelle: | Enthalten in: American journal of transplantation |
Ort Quelle: | [Amsterdam] : Elsevier, 2001 |
Jahr Quelle: | 2019 |
Band/Heft Quelle: | 19(2019), 4, Seite 975-983 |
ISSN Quelle: | 1600-6143 |
Abstract: | Therapeutic hypothermia, hypothermic pulsatile machine perfusion (MP), and renal-dose dopamine administered to stable brain-dead donors have shown efficacy to reduce the dialysis requirement after kidney transplantation. In a head-to-head comparison of the three major randomized controlled trials in this field, we estimated the number-needed-to-treat for each method, evaluated costs and inquired into special features regarding long-term outcomes. The MP and hypothermia trials used any dialysis requirement during the first postoperative week, whereas the dopamine trial assessed >1 dialysis session as primary endpoint. Compared to controls, the respective rates declined by 5.7% with MP, 10.9% with hypothermia, and 10.7% with dopamine. Costs to prevent one endpoint in one recipient amount to approximately $17 000 with MP but are negligible with the donor interventions. MP resulted in a borderline significant difference of 4% in 3-year graft survival, but a point of interest is that the preservation method was switched in 25 donors (4.6%) for technical reasons. Graft survival was not improved with dopamine on intention-to-treat but suggested an exposure-response relationship with infusion time. MP was less efficacious and cost-effective to prevent posttransplant dialysis. Whether the benefit on early graft dysfunction achieved with any method will improve long-term graft survival remains to be established. |
DOI: | doi:10.1111/ajt.15317 |
URL: | Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.
Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.15317 |
| Volltext: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ajt.15317 |
| DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.15317 |
Datenträger: | Online-Ressource |
Sprache: | eng |
Sach-SW: | clinical research/practice |
| critical care/intensive care management |
| delayed graft function (DGF) |
| donors and donation: deceased |
| kidney (allograft) function/dysfunction |
| organ perfusion and preservation |
| organ procurement and allocation |
| organ transplantation in general |
K10plus-PPN: | 1665099747 |
Verknüpfungen: | → Zeitschrift |
Donor organ intervention before kidney transplantation / Schnülle, Peter [VerfasserIn]; [2019] (Online-Ressource)