Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Gomes Botelho Quintas, Bruna [VerfasserIn]   i
 Geis, Nicolas [VerfasserIn]   i
 Leuschner, Florian [VerfasserIn]   i
 Meder, Benjamin [VerfasserIn]   i
 Konstandin, Mathias [VerfasserIn]   i
 Katus, Hugo [VerfasserIn]   i
 Bekeredjian, Raffi [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Periprocedural antibiotic treatment in transvascular aortic valve replacement
Verf.angabe:Bruna Gomes, Nicolas A. Geis, Florian Leuschner, Benjamin Meder, Mathias Konstandin, Hugo A. Katus, Raffi Bekeredjian
E-Jahr:2018
Jahr:05 November 2018
Umfang:6 S.
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 10.05.2019
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Journal of interventional cardiology
Ort Quelle:London : Hindawi, 1988
Jahr Quelle:2018
Band/Heft Quelle:31(2018), 6, Seite 885-890
ISSN Quelle:1540-8183
Abstract:Background: To date, there are no guidelines recommending a specific prophylactic antibiotic treatment in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The aim of this study is to evaluate clinical data after TAVR with different periprocedural antibiotic regimens. Methods: In May 2015 the institutional rules for periprocedural antibiotic prophylaxis were changed from 3 days to 1 day. Thus, a total of 450 consecutive TAVR patients between February 2014 and June 2016 were classified into two intention-to-treat groups: patients receiving a 1-day Cefuroxime prophylaxis (N = 225); patients receiving a 3-day Cefuroxime prophylaxis (N = 225). Results: One-day Cefuroxime regimen was not associated with shorter hospitalization (3-day Cefuroxime 9 ± 4.7 vs 1-day Cefuroxime 8.9 ± 4.0; P = 0.87). Incidence of diarrhea (26.2% vs 18.2%; P = 0.04) and Clostridium difficile infections (4% vs 0.4%; P = 0.01) were significantly higher in the 3-day group. No endocarditis was registered after 1 year follow-up. There was no difference in 30-day overall mortality rate, major vascular complications, bleeding complications, pacemaker-implantation rate, paravalvular regurgitation, or acute kidney injury between patients groups. Conclusion: Three-day Cefuroxime prophylaxis does not seem to be advantageous compared to a shorter 1-day regimen, but even shows a significantly higher incidence of diarrhea and Clostridium difficile infection.
DOI:doi:10.1111/joic.12567
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext ; Verlag: https://doi.org/10.1111/joic.12567
 Volltext: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/joic.12567
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joic.12567
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:antibiotic prophylaxis
 aortic stenosis
 endocarditis
 TAVR
K10plus-PPN:166515943X
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68388681   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang