Parliaments and parliamentarism in the works of Soviet dissidents, 1960s-80s

• Verfasst von: Sablin, Ivan [VerfasserIn]
• Titel: Parliaments and parliamentarism in the works of Soviet dissidents, 1960s-80s
• Verf.angabe: Ivan Sablin
• E-Jahr: 2019
• Jahr: 10 May 2019
• Umfang: 19 S.
• Fussnoten: Gesehen am 27.05.2019
• Titel Quelle: Enthalten in: Parliaments, estates & representation
• Ort Quelle: Abingdon : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1981
• Jahr Quelle: 2019
• Band/Heft Quelle: (2019), Seite 1-19
• ISSN Quelle: 1947-248X
• DOI: doi:10.1080/02606755.2019.1615672
• Datenträger: Online-Ressource
• Sprache: eng
• Sach-SW: dissident
• Sach-SW: Parliamentarism
• Sach-SW: samizdat
• Sach-SW: Supreme Soviet
• Sach-SW: USSR
• K10plus-PPN: 1666341827

Abstract

Drawing from samizdat (self-published) and tamizdat (foreign-published) materials, this article traces the understandings of parliaments and parliamentarism in individual works by Soviet dissidents and reconstructs the authors’ underlying assumptions in the application of the two ideas. It focuses on the articulations and the implications of four concepts pertaining to parliamentarism - deliberation, representation, responsibility, and sovereignty - in the dissidents’ criticisms of Soviet ‘parliamentarism’ and their own parliamentary designs. Despite the consensus that the USSR Supreme Soviet was both a façade and pseudo parliament and the frequent appeals to popular sovereignty, only a handful of authors discussed parliamentarism as the latter’s manifestation before the Perestroika. With very few dissidents placing deliberation at the centre of a post-Soviet order, the conviction that social and political systems should be based on an ‘ultimate truth’ and respective societal blueprints dominated the dissident discourse in which a parliament, if mentioned at all, was a rostrum rather than a forum.