Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Laryionava, Katsiaryna [VerfasserIn]   i
 Hartmann, Mechthild [VerfasserIn]   i
 Sklenárová, Halina [VerfasserIn]   i
 Jäger, Dirk [VerfasserIn]   i
 Winkler, Eva C. [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Cancer patients’ preferences for either quality of life or a longer life determine their willingness to talk about forgoing cancer-specific treatment
Verf.angabe:Katsiaryna Laryionava, Mechthild Hartmann, Halina Sklenarova, Pia Heussner, Matthias Villalobos, Dirk Jäger, Eva C. Winkler
E-Jahr:2019
Jahr:July 10, 2019
Umfang:8 S.
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 22.10.2019
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Oncology research and treatment
Ort Quelle:Basel : Karger, 2014
Jahr Quelle:2019
Band/Heft Quelle:42(2019), 9, Seite 458-465
ISSN Quelle:2296-5262
Abstract:Background: Cancer patients often face decisions whether to proceed with cancer-specific treatment or to switch to best supportive care. In these decisions, patients’ preferences should be determining cornerstones. The aim of this survey was to elicit patients’ preferences regarding discussions about forgoing treatment and factors influencing their preferences. Methods: We surveyed 194 patients at the National Center for Tumor Diseases, Germany. Quality of life (FACT-G), cancer-specific distress (QSC-R10), anxiety/depression (PHQ-4/GAD-2), preferences regarding quality/length of life (QQ), patient-physician communication (CARES-SF), and family role (CCAT-P) were assessed. Results: Patients weighting quality of life over lifetime wanted their oncologists to address treatment limitations as early as possible (p = 0.00). Patients striving for a longer lifetime did not want such discussions (p = 0.05). Having discussed treatment limitations was not associated with increased anxiety, depression, or distress. Limiting treatment was discussed only with one-third of the patients with a prognosis of less than 6 months and rather with elderly patients or patients in a worse medical condition. Attributing an important role to family decisions was associated with striving for lifetime (p = 0.01). Conclusion: Preferences for either quality or length of life were associated with patients’ willingness to discuss forgoing cancer-specific treatment. Timely discussion of realistic treatment goals is one way to avoid overtreatment. Patients striving for lifetime require increased attention and opportunities to address prognosis and risks of treatment.
DOI:doi:10.1159/000501129
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1159/000501129
 Verlag: https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/501129
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000501129
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
K10plus-PPN:1679293672
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68443477   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang