Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Seidling, Hanna [VerfasserIn]   i
 Stützle, Marion [VerfasserIn]   i
 Hoppe-Tichy, Torsten [VerfasserIn]   i
 Störzinger, Dominic [VerfasserIn]   i
 Taylor, Lenka A. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Haefeli, Walter E. [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Best practice strategies to safeguard drug prescribing and drug administration
Titelzusatz:an anthology of expert views and opinions
Verf.angabe:Hanna M. Seidling, Marion Stützle, Torsten Hoppe-Tichy, Benoît Allenet, Pierrick Bedouch, Pascal Bonnabry, Jamie J. Coleman, Fernando Fernandez-Llimos, Christian Lovis, Maria Jose Rei, Dominic Störzinger, Lenka A. Taylor, Sarah K. Pontefract, Patricia M.L.A. van den Bemt, Heleen van der Sijs, Walter E. Haefeli
E-Jahr:2016
Jahr:10 March 2016
Umfang:12 S.
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 22.11.2019
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: International journal of clinical pharmacy
Ort Quelle:Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer, 2011
Jahr Quelle:2016
Band/Heft Quelle:38(2016), 2, Seite 362-373
ISSN Quelle:2210-7711
Abstract:Background While evidence on implementation of medication safety strategies is increasing, reasons for selecting and relinquishing distinct strategies and details on implementation are typically not shared in published literature. Objective We aimed to collect and structure expert information resulting from implementing medication safety strategies to provide advice for decision-makers. Setting Medication safety experts with clinical expertise from thirteen hospitals throughout twelve European and North American countries shared their experience in workshop meetings, on-site-visits and remote structured interviews. Methods We performed an expert-based, in-depth assessment of implementation of best-practice strategies to improve drug prescribing and drug administration. Main outcome measures Workflow, variability and recommended medication safety strategies in drug prescribing and drug administration processes. Results According to the experts, institutions chose strategies that targeted process steps known to be particularly error-prone in the respective setting. Often, the selection was channeled by local constraints such as the e-health equipment and critically modulated by national context factors. In our study, the experts favored electronic prescribing with clinical decision support and medication reconciliation as most promising interventions. They agreed that self-assessment and introduction of medication safety boards were crucial to satisfy the setting-specific differences and foster successful implementation. Conclusion While general evidence for implementation of strategies to improve medication safety exists, successful selection and adaptation of a distinct strategy requires a thorough knowledge of the institute-specific constraints and an ongoing monitoring and adjustment of the implemented measures.
DOI:doi:10.1007/s11096-016-0253-1
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-016-0253-1
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-016-0253-1
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:Computerized physician order entry
 CPOE
 Expert discussion
 Inpatient care
 Medication reconciliation
 Medication safety
 Quality improvement
K10plus-PPN:1682545784
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68459222   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang