International consensus statement on robotic pancreatic surgery

• Verfasst von: Liu, Rong [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Hackert, Thilo [VerfasserIn]
• Titel: International consensus statement on robotic pancreatic surgery
• Verf.angabe: Rong Liu, Go Wakabayashi, Chinnusamy Palanivelu, Allan Tsung, Kehu Yang, Brian K. P. Goh, Charing Ching-Ning Chong, Chang Moo Kang, Chenghong Peng, Eli Kakiashvili, Ho-Seong Han, Hong-Jin Kim, Jin He, Jae Hoon Lee, Kyoichi Takaori, Marco Vito Marino, Shen-Nien Wang, Tiankang Guo, Thilo Hackert, Ting-Shuo Huang, Yiengpruksawan Anusak, Yuman Fong, Yuichi Nagakawa, Yi-Ming Shyr, Yao-Ming Wu, Yupei Zhao
• E-Jahr: 2019
• Jahr: August 2019
• Umfang: 16 S.
• Teil: volume:8
• Teil: year:2019
• Teil: number:4
• Teil: pages:345-360
• Teil: extent:16
• Fussnoten: Gesehen am 09.12.2019
• Titel Quelle: Enthalten in: Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition
• Ort Quelle: Hong Kong : AME Publishing Co., 2012
• Jahr Quelle: 2019
• Band/Heft Quelle: 8(2019), 4, Seite 345-360
• ISSN Quelle: 2304-389X
• DOI: doi:10.21037/hbsn.2019.07.08
• Datenträger: Online-Ressource
• Sprache: eng
• K10plus-PPN: 1684865743

Abstract

The robotic surgical system has been applied to various types of pancreatic surgery. However, controversies exist regarding a variety of factors including the safety, feasibility, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of robotic surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the current status of robotic pancreatic surgery and put forth experts’ consensus and recommendations to promote its development. Based on the WHO Handbook for Guideline Development, a Consensus Steering Group and a Consensus Development Group were established to determine the topics, prepare evidence-based documents, and generate recommendations. The GRADE Grid method and Delphi vote were used to formulate the recommendations. A total of 19 topics were analyzed. The first 16 recommendations were generated by GRADE using an evidence-based method (EBM) and focused on the safety, feasibility, indication, techniques, certification of the robotic surgeon, and cost-effectiveness of robotic pancreatic surgery. The remaining three recommendations were based on literature review and expert panel opinion due to insufficient EBM results. Since the current amount of evidence was low/meager as evaluated by the GRADE method, further randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed in the future to validate these recommendations.