Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Strzelczyk, Adam [VerfasserIn]   i
 Schubert-Bast, Susanne [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Predictors of and attitudes toward counseling about SUDEP and other epilepsy risk factors among Austrian, German, and Swiss neurologists and neuropediatricians
Verf.angabe:Adam Strzelczyk, Gerda Zschebek, Sebastian Bauer, Christoph Baumgartner, Martin Grond, Anke Hermsen, Matthias Kieslich, Günter Krämer, Gerhard Kurlemann, Theodor W. May, Thomas Mayer, Bernd A. Neubauer, Margarete Pfäfflin, Barbara Plecko, Philippe Ryvlin, Susanne Schubert‐Bast, Hermann Stefan, Eugen Trinka, Susanne Knake, Carola Seifart, and Felix Rosenow
E-Jahr:2016
Jahr:Feruary 22, 2016
Umfang:9 S.
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 11.12.2019
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Epilepsia
Ort Quelle:Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1909
Jahr Quelle:2016
Band/Heft Quelle:57(2016), 4, Seite 612-620
ISSN Quelle:1528-1167
Abstract:Objective To examine the attitudes toward counseling about sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) and other epilepsy risk factors among Austrian, German, and Swiss neurologists and neuropediatricians, and to determine factors associated with not discussing SUDEP. Methods Questionnaires were sent to approximately 5,000 neurologists and neuropediatricians in 2014 regarding respondents’ demographics, their working environments, and how often they discussed SUDEP, suicidal ideations on anticonvulsive medication, driving restrictions, and risks in daily life activities. Results In total, 519 surveys were completed (respondents’ mean age: 45.5 years, 41.6% female, 66.9% adult neurologists, 31.0% neuropediatricians). A minority of 2.7% reported that they counseled all of their patients on SUDEP, 8.7% counseled most of the time (50-90%), 20.8% sometimes (10-49%), 44.5% rarely (1-9%), and 23.3% reported not counseling about SUDEP at all. In contrast, 92.9% reported that they counseled all patients about driving restrictions and 81.5% about risks in daily life activities. Suicidal ideations were discussed in 59.0% for some and in 3.3% for all patients, whereas 35.1% of respondents reported never discussing suicidal ideations. Independent predictors of not discussing SUDEP were no additional epilepsy training, no or uncertain SUDEP cases in the past, <10 years in practice, <25 epilepsy patients seen per quarter, and the opinion of a lack of consequences in SUDEP prevention. The opinion that SUDEP is a risk factor in particular patient groups and the attitude that all risks should be discussed predicted counseling on SUDEP. Significance Our findings show a discrepancy between guidelines and practice regarding the discussion of premature mortality due to SUDEP or suicidality. Both are not discussed at all by a substantial proportion of neurologists and neuropediatricians. This is in contrast to ubiquitous education about driving restrictions. Dissemination of knowledge among physicians about potential preventive strategies might increase the likelihood of discussion. Clinical practice guidelines are welcomed by the majority of physicians in this process.
DOI:doi:10.1111/epi.13337
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext ; Verlag: https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.13337
 Volltext: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/epi.13337
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.13337
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:Counseling
 Driving
 Drowning
 Epilepsy
 Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy patients
 Suicide
K10plus-PPN:1685129072
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68466616   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang