Detection of MRSA in nasal swabs - marked reduction of time to report for negative reports by substituting classical manual workflow with total lab automation

• Verfasst von: Burckhardt, Irene [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Horner, Susanne [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Burckhardt, Florian [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Zimmermann, Stefan [VerfasserIn]
• Titel: Detection of MRSA in nasal swabs - marked reduction of time to report for negative reports by substituting classical manual workflow with total lab automation
• Verf.angabe: Irene Burckhardt, Susanne Horner, Florian Burckhardt, Stefan Zimmermann
• E-Jahr: 2018
• Jahr: 25 June 2018
• Umfang: 7 S.
• Fussnoten: Gesehen am 30.01.2020
• Titel Quelle: Enthalten in: European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases
• Ort Quelle: Berlin : Springer, 1982
• Jahr Quelle: 2018
• Band/Heft Quelle: 37(2018), 9, Seite 1745-1751
• ISSN Quelle: 1435-4373
• DOI: doi:10.1007/s10096-018-3308-5
• Datenträger: Online-Ressource
• Sprache: eng
• K10plus-PPN: 1688922423

Abstract

In 2016, the workflow for MRSA detection in nasal swabs was changed from a classic-manual workflow to an automated workflow using total lab automation (TLA; BD Kiestra). This change entailed a reduction of the incubation time from 2 days to 20 h and reading of plates on weekdays and weekends instead of weekdays only. The workflow alteration did not include the introduction of 24/7. We wanted to follow up on the consequences for the times to report (TTR). We compared the TTR of all nasal swabs, which were sent for MRSA detection from June until August in 2015 (workflow—classic-manual) and in 2016 (workflow—automated). We calculated median TTR and interquartile ranges for the three possible reporting outcomes (negative, MRSA-known, MRSA-new) per day and workflow. A multivariable linear regression modeled the exposure variables workflow, day, and reporting outcome on TTR including interaction variables. The quantity and reasons for a TTR longer than 3 days were analyzed. During both 3-month periods, a total of 16,111 reports were issued (2015:7620; 2016:8491). The median TTR for negative reports was 48:28 (hh:mm) in 2015 and 23:58 in 2016. In the linear regression, all exposure variables had a strong and highly significant (p < 0.001) influence on the TTR. The number of reports with a TTR longer than 3 days shrank from 2418 (2015) to 60 (2016). The workflow alteration halved the median TTR for negative reports and the number of reports with a TTR longer than 3 days was reduced by 97.5%.