Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Patenaude, Bryan N. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Bärnighausen, Till [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:The value of a statistical life-year in sub-Saharan Africa
Titelzusatz:evidence from a large population-based survey in Tanzania
Verf.angabe:Bryan N. Patenaude, Innocent Semali, Japhet Killewo, Till Bärnighausen
E-Jahr:2019
Jahr:5 September 2019
Umfang:6 S.
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 06.04.2020
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Value in health regional issues
Ort Quelle:Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 2012
Jahr Quelle:2019
Band/Heft Quelle:19(2019), Seite 151-156
ISSN Quelle:2212-1102
Abstract:Background - The value of a statistical life-year (VSLY) is the central number for the economic allocation of health resources. Nevertheless, empirical data on VSLY are lacking for most low- and middle- income countries. In the absence of empirically established VSLY, researchers typically use an arbitrary 3-times multiple of per-capita gross domestic product or per-capita income per life-year saved to establish cost-effectiveness. - Objective - In this study, we establish an empirical VSLY for the first time for a community in sub-Saharan Africa. - Methods - To empirically establish VSLY, we randomly selected 4000 individuals in the Ukonga community of Tanzania and employed a contingent valuation survey to measure VSLY. Using the contingent valuation methodology, we elicited willingness to pay for a 2% mortality risk reduction and had individuals convert this into an annualized payment to be paid each year over their expected remaining life. - Results - We compared our elicited value to per-capita income and found that mean VSLY is $9340 (95% CI $6206-$12 373). The mean annual income in our sample was $2069, resulting in a VSLY that is equivalent to 4.5 times per-capita income. - Conclusion - Our results provide empirical evidence to support moving away from using the World Health Organization cost-effectiveness thresholds in practice because they will likely result in inefficient underinvestment in cost-effective interventions, even in relatively poor samples.
DOI:doi:10.1016/j.vhri.2019.07.009
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext ; Verlag: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vhri.2019.07.009
 Volltext: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109919300950
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vhri.2019.07.009
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:cost-effectiveness
 economic evaluation
 health policy
 public health
 stated preference
K10plus-PPN:169411211X
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68561838   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang