Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Bokor-Billmann, Therezia [VerfasserIn]   i
 Langan, Ewan Andrew [VerfasserIn]   i
 Billmann, Franck [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:The reporting of race and/or ethnicity in the medical literature
Titelzusatz:a retrospective bibliometric analysis confirmed room for improvement
Verf.angabe:Therezia Bokor-Billmann, MD, Ewan A. Langan, MD, Franck Billmann, MD, PhD
E-Jahr:2020
Jahr:[2020]
Jahr des Originals:2019
Umfang:6 S.
Fussnoten:Published online 9 November 2019 ; Gesehen am 14.04.2020
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Journal of clinical epidemiology
Ort Quelle:Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1988
Jahr Quelle:2020
Band/Heft Quelle:119(2020), Seite 1-6
ISSN Quelle:1878-5921
Abstract:Objectives - Although the collection of race and/or ethnicity data is an important way to identify and address inequalities in health care provision and disparities in access to treatment, studies examining the extent to which race and/or ethnicity data are reported in the medical literature, and the quality of these data, are lacking. Therefore, we sought to objectively determine the quality of reporting of race and/or ethnicity in original medical research papers. - Study Design and Setting - A retrospective bibliometric analysis was used. Two independent investigators analyzed original articles investigating race/ethnicity, published between 2007 and 2018, in the 10 top-ranking academic journals in each of the following categories: general medicine, surgery, and oncology. - Results - A total of 995 original articles were included in our analysis. Only 45 studies (4.52%) provided a formal definition of race/ethnicity, and 8.94% identified the investigator responsible for the classification. While race/ethnicity was a key part of study design in 31.86% of the included investigations, the method used to classify individuals into racial/ethnic groups was described in only 10.25% of articles. In terms of terminology, we identified 81 different race/ethnicity classifications, but these were often imprecise and open to interpretation. - Conclusion - There is significant room for improvement in the collection, reporting, and publishing of data describing ethnicity and/or race in the medical literature.
DOI:doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.11.005
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext ; Verlag: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.11.005
 Volltext: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435619302446
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.11.005
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:Data collection
 Ethnic groups
 Guideline adherence
 Medical writing
 Population groups
 Publishing
K10plus-PPN:1694456293
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68563877   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang