Virtual raters for reproducible and objective assessments in radiology

• Verfasst von: Kleesiek, Jens Philipp [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Petersen, Jens [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Döring, Markus [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Maier-Hein, Klaus H. [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Köthe, Ullrich [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Wick, Wolfgang [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Hamprecht, Fred [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Bendszus, Martin [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Biller, Armin [VerfasserIn]
• Titel: Virtual raters for reproducible and objective assessments in radiology
• Verf.angabe: Jens Kleesiek, Jens Petersen, Markus Döring, Klaus Maier-Hein, Ullrich Köthe, Wolfgang Wick, Fred A. Hamprecht, Martin Bendszus & Armin Biller
• E-Jahr: 2016
• Jahr: 22 April 2016
• Umfang: 11 S.
• Illustrationen: Illustrationen
• Fussnoten: Gesehen am 13.05.2020
• Titel Quelle: Enthalten in: Scientific reports
• Ort Quelle: [London] : Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nature, 2011
• Jahr Quelle: 2016
• Band/Heft Quelle: 6(2016) Artikel-Nummer 25007, 11 Seiten
• ISSN Quelle: 2045-2322
• DOI: doi:10.1038/srep25007
• Datenträger: Online-Ressource
• Sprache: eng
• K10plus-PPN: 1698143931

Abstract

Volumetric measurements in radiologic images are important for monitoring tumor growth and treatment response. To make these more reproducible and objective we introduce the concept of virtual raters (VRs). A virtual rater is obtained by combining knowledge of machine-learning algorithms trained with past annotations of multiple human raters with the instantaneous rating of one human expert. Thus, he is virtually guided by several experts. To evaluate the approach we perform experiments with multi-channel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data sets. Next to gross tumor volume (GTV) we also investigate subcategories like edema, contrast-enhancing and non-enhancing tumor. The first data set consists of N = 71 longitudinal follow-up scans of 15 patients suffering from glioblastoma (GB). The second data set comprises N = 30 scans of low- and high-grade gliomas. For comparison we computed Pearson Correlation, Intra-class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Dice score. Virtual raters always lead to an improvement w.r.t. inter- and intra-rater agreement. Comparing the 2D Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) measurements to the volumetric measurements of the virtual raters results in one-third of the cases in a deviating rating. Hence, we believe that our approach will have an impact on the evaluation of clinical studies as well as on routine imaging diagnostics.