Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Lv, Zheng-tao [VerfasserIn]   i
 Li, Zhi-Qiang [VerfasserIn]   i
 Zhou, Xiang [VerfasserIn]   i
 Ma, Wen-Wen [VerfasserIn]   i
 Zhang, Jin-Ming [VerfasserIn]   i
 Chen, An-Min [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Acupuncture versus non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for treatment of chondromalacia patellae
Titelzusatz:a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Verf.angabe:Zheng-Tao Lv, Zhi-Qiang Li, Xiang Zhou, Wen-Wen Ma, Jin-Ming Zhang, An-Min Chen
E-Jahr:2016
Jahr:December 13, 2016
Umfang:7 S.
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 20.05.2020
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Forschende Komplementärmedizin
Ort Quelle:Basel : Karger, 1994
Jahr Quelle:2016
Band/Heft Quelle:23(2016), 6, Seite 344-350
ISSN Quelle:1661-4127
Abstract:This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture therapy for treating patients with chondromalacia patellae compared to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID). Eight databases including PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, ISI Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and CBM were searched up to June 2016. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) assessing the efficacy of acupuncture therapy were identified. The patients in experimental groups had to be treated with acupuncture therapy, and the patients in control groups had to be treated with NSAID. The outcome measures included clinical efficacy rates or pain scores. A total of 7 studies met our inclusion criteria. We analyzed the data from these 7 RCT involving 707 participants. All included studies were judged to be at high risk for bias. Compared with NSAID, acupuncture could further improve the clinical efficacy rates (Risk Ratio 2.57; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.02, 3.27) and pain scores (Mean Difference -1.49; 95% CI -2.37, -0.62). No study reported adverse events associated with acupuncture therapy. Based on the findings in the present review, acupuncture therapy is more effective than NSAID in improving clinical efficacy rates and pain scores. However, these results should be interpreted cautiously due to the poor overall methodological quality of the included trials. Additional studies with large-scale and rigorous experimental design are required.
DOI:doi:10.1159/000453345
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext ; Verlag: https://doi.org/10.1159/000453345
 Volltext: https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/453345
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000453345
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
K10plus-PPN:1698632134
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68579718   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang