Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Zettl, Max [VerfasserIn]   i
 Volkert, Jana [VerfasserIn]   i
 Vögele, Claus [VerfasserIn]   i
 Herpertz, Sabine [VerfasserIn]   i
 Kubera, Katharina Maria [VerfasserIn]   i
 Taubner, Svenja [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Mentalization and criterion a of the alternative model for personality disorders
Titelzusatz:results from a clinical and nonclinical sample
Verf.angabe:Max Zettl and Jana Volkert, Claus Vögele, Sabine C. Herpertz, Katharina M. Kubera and Svenja Taubner
Jahr:2020
Umfang:11 S.
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 04.06.2020 ; Published online September 2, 2019
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Personality disorders
Ort Quelle:[Washington, DC] : American Psychological Association, 2009
Jahr Quelle:2020
Band/Heft Quelle:11(2020), 3, Seite 191-201
ISSN Quelle:1949-2723
Abstract:Criterion A of the alternative model for the classification of personality disorders in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), introduced the Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS), a dimensional model for the assessment of impairments in self and interpersonal functioning. The LPFS was developed based on a review of different measures of personality functioning, such as the Reflective Functioning Scale, a measure of mentalizing. This study investigated the empirical overlap between the LPFS and mentalization. The study sample included adult inpatients (n = 55) with a mental disorder and a healthy adult control group (n = 55). All participants were examined regarding the LPFS using the Semistructured Interview for Personality Functioning DSM-5; mentalizing was assessed with the Brief Reflective Functioning Interview and coded with the Reflective Functioning Scale. We used structural equation modeling to investigate the relationship between LPFS domains and mentalization. Correlation analysis was used to examine the agreement between interview-rated LPFS and self-report measures of personality dysfunction. All domains of the LPFS were significantly related to mentalizing. Interview-rated LPFS was significantly associated with self-reported personality dysfunction. The findings support the notion that the LPFS and mentalization share a strong conceptual and operational overlap by demonstrating that both constructs are empirically interrelated. The results yield further support for the validity of the LPFS as a dimensional model for the assessment of personality disorder severity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved)
DOI:doi:10.1037/per0000356
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext ; Verlag: https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000356
 Volltext: http://www.redi-bw.de/db/ebsco.php/search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx%3fdirect%3dtrue%26db%3dpdh%26AN%3d2019-51299-001%26si ...
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000356
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:Ability Level
 alternative model for personality disorders
 Clinical Models
 level of personality functioning
 Mental Disorders
 Mental Models
 Mentalization
 personality disorders
 Personality Disorders
 Personality Processes
 reflective functioning
 Reflectiveness
 Self-Report
K10plus-PPN:169979619X
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68583941   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang