Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Möller, Hans-Jürgen [VerfasserIn]   i
 Herpertz, Sabine [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:DSM-5 reviewed from different angles
Titelzusatz:goal attainment, rationality, use of evidence, consequences : part 1: general aspects and paradigmatic discussion of depressive disorders
Verf.angabe:Hans-Jürgen Möller, Borwin Bandelow, Michael Bauer, Harald Hampel, Sabine C. Herpertz, Michael Soyka, Utako B. Barnikol, Simone Lista, Emanuel Severus, Wolfgang Maier
Jahr:2015
Jahr des Originals:2014
Umfang:14 S.
Fussnoten:Published online: 14 August 2014 ; Gesehen am 12.06.2020
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience
Ort Quelle:Darmstadt : Steinkopff, 1868
Jahr Quelle:2015
Band/Heft Quelle:265(2015), 1, Seite 5-18
ISSN Quelle:1433-8491
Abstract:DSM-5 was published in 2013 after about 10 years of preparation. Part 1 of this paper discusses several more general aspects of DSM-5 and offers a detailed, paradigmatic analysis of changes made to the chapter on depressive disorders. The background for the changes is analysed on the basis of a PubMed search and review papers on the classification of mental disorders in general and on empirical knowledge about individual disorders. Contrary to the original plans, DSM-5 has not introduced a primarily dimensional diagnostic system but has widely preserved the categorical system of disorders. Also, it has not adopted a more neurobiological approach to disorders by including biological markers to increase the objectivity of psychiatric diagnoses but has maintained the primarily symptom-based, descriptive approach. The criteria for some disorders have been changed, including affective, schizophrenic and addiction disorders, and a few new disorders have been added. A minimal version of the dimensional approach was realised through the introduction of several transnosological specifiers and the option to make symptom- or syndrome-related severity and dimensional assessments. These specifiers and assessments might allow a more individualised description of a patient’s psychopathological state and more personalised treatment. However, most of the symptom- and syndrome-related assessments are not mandatory and therefore may not be used in clinical practice.
DOI:doi:10.1007/s00406-014-0520-x
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext ; Verlag: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-014-0520-x
 Volltext: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00406-014-0520-x
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-014-0520-x
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
K10plus-PPN:1700521268
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68586336   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang