| Online-Ressource |
Verfasst von: | Möller, Hans-Jürgen [VerfasserIn]  |
| Herpertz, Sabine [VerfasserIn]  |
Titel: | DSM-5 reviewed from different angles |
Titelzusatz: | goal attainment, rationality, use of evidence, consequences : part 1: general aspects and paradigmatic discussion of depressive disorders |
Verf.angabe: | Hans-Jürgen Möller, Borwin Bandelow, Michael Bauer, Harald Hampel, Sabine C. Herpertz, Michael Soyka, Utako B. Barnikol, Simone Lista, Emanuel Severus, Wolfgang Maier |
Jahr: | 2015 |
Jahr des Originals: | 2014 |
Umfang: | 14 S. |
Fussnoten: | Published online: 14 August 2014 ; Gesehen am 12.06.2020 |
Titel Quelle: | Enthalten in: European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience |
Ort Quelle: | Darmstadt : Steinkopff, 1868 |
Jahr Quelle: | 2015 |
Band/Heft Quelle: | 265(2015), 1, Seite 5-18 |
ISSN Quelle: | 1433-8491 |
Abstract: | DSM-5 was published in 2013 after about 10 years of preparation. Part 1 of this paper discusses several more general aspects of DSM-5 and offers a detailed, paradigmatic analysis of changes made to the chapter on depressive disorders. The background for the changes is analysed on the basis of a PubMed search and review papers on the classification of mental disorders in general and on empirical knowledge about individual disorders. Contrary to the original plans, DSM-5 has not introduced a primarily dimensional diagnostic system but has widely preserved the categorical system of disorders. Also, it has not adopted a more neurobiological approach to disorders by including biological markers to increase the objectivity of psychiatric diagnoses but has maintained the primarily symptom-based, descriptive approach. The criteria for some disorders have been changed, including affective, schizophrenic and addiction disorders, and a few new disorders have been added. A minimal version of the dimensional approach was realised through the introduction of several transnosological specifiers and the option to make symptom- or syndrome-related severity and dimensional assessments. These specifiers and assessments might allow a more individualised description of a patient’s psychopathological state and more personalised treatment. However, most of the symptom- and syndrome-related assessments are not mandatory and therefore may not be used in clinical practice. |
DOI: | doi:10.1007/s00406-014-0520-x |
URL: | Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.
Volltext ; Verlag: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-014-0520-x |
| Volltext: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00406-014-0520-x |
| DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-014-0520-x |
Datenträger: | Online-Ressource |
Sprache: | eng |
K10plus-PPN: | 1700521268 |
Verknüpfungen: | → Zeitschrift |
DSM-5 reviewed from different angles / Möller, Hans-Jürgen [VerfasserIn]; 2015 (Online-Ressource)