Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Baessler, Franziska [VerfasserIn]   i
 Weidlich, Joshua [VerfasserIn]   i
 Schweizer-Schubert, Sophie [VerfasserIn]   i
 Ciprianidis, Anja [VerfasserIn]   i
 Bartolovic, Marina [VerfasserIn]   i
 Zafar, Ali [VerfasserIn]   i
 Wolf, Michael [VerfasserIn]   i
 Wagner, Fabienne L. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Baumann, Tabea C. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Mihaljevic, André Leopold [VerfasserIn]   i
 Ditzen, Beate [VerfasserIn]   i
 Roesch-Ely, Daniela [VerfasserIn]   i
 Nikendei, Christoph [VerfasserIn]   i
 Schultz, Jobst-Hendrik [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:What and how are students taught about communicating risks to patients?
Titelzusatz:analysis of a medical curriculum
Verf.angabe:Franziska Baessler, Joshua Weidlich, Sophie Schweizer, Anja Ciprianidis, Marina Bartolovic, Ali Zafar, Michael Wolf, Fabienne Louise Wagner, Tabea Chiara Baumann, Andre L. Mihaljevic, Beate Ditzen, Daniela Roesch-Ely, Christoph Nikendei, Jobst-Hendrik Schultz
E-Jahr:2020
Jahr:May 29, 2020
Umfang:14 S.
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 06.07.2020
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: PLOS ONE
Ort Quelle:San Francisco, California, US : PLOS, 2006
Jahr Quelle:2020
Band/Heft Quelle:15(2020,5) Artikel-Nummer e0233682, 14 Seiten
ISSN Quelle:1932-6203
Abstract:Background Communication is a core competence in medical care. Failure of physicians to properly communicate inherent risks of medical interventions has been linked with inadequate training at school. This study analyses a medical curriculum for assessing the content and quality of teaching risk communication to students. Methods A checklist based on the national guidelines of core competencies on risk communication required of physicians was developed. Participant observers surveyed all teaching sessions at a medical school during a semester to record the frequency, characteristics and clinical context used by lectures during classes. Data were analyzed using statistical and descriptive methods to determine the prevalence and quality of teaching content. Results 231 teaching sessions were surveyed. The inter-rater reliability was 81%. Lecturers mentioned topics of risk communication in 61.5% of teaching sessions (83.7% in surgery, 43.3% in internal medicine) but core biostatistics concepts were not discussed in more than 80% of these sessions. Important topics such as patient safety and preventable diseases were underrepresented. Risk communication was mainly taught in large -group, theoretical sessions and rarely with supplementary teaching material (7.4%). Students asked questions in 15.2% of courses, more often in surgery classes than in internal medicine. Conclusion Statistical and clinical topics relevant for teaching risk communication to medical students are not only underrepresented but also minimally explained by lecturers. Supplementary material on risk communication is rarely provided to students during classes. High-resource demanding, small-group teaching formats are not necessarily interactive as students ask few questions.
DOI:doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0233682
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233682
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233682
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:1st
 education
 health
 numeracy
 physicians
 primary-care
 shared decision-making
 skills
K10plus-PPN:1703757750
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68613832   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang