Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Müller, Beat P. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Achtstätter, Lena Verena [VerfasserIn]   i
 Diener, Markus K. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Büchler, Markus W. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Linke, Georg R. [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Repair of paraesophageal hiatal Hernias-is a fundoplication needed?
Titelzusatz: a randomized controlled pilot trial
Verf.angabe:Beat P. Müller-Stich, Verena Achtstätter, Markus K. Diener, Matthias Gondan, René Warschkow, Francesco Marra, Andreas Zerz, Carsten N. Gutt, Markus W. Büchler, Georg R. Linke
E-Jahr:2015
Jahr:14 March 2015
Umfang:9 S.
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 03.08.2020
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: American College of SurgeonsJournal of the American College of Surgeons
Ort Quelle:[Philadelphia, Pa.] : Wolters Kluwer Health, 1997
Jahr Quelle:2015
Band/Heft Quelle:221(2015), 2, Seite 602-610
ISSN Quelle:1879-1190
Abstract:Background - The need for a fundoplication during repair of paraesophageal hiatal hernias (PEH) remains unclear. Prevention of gastroesophageal reflux represents a trade-off against the risk of fundoplication-related side effects. The aim of this trial was to compare laparoscopic mesh-augmented hiatoplasty with simple cardiophrenicopexy (LMAH-C) with laparoscopic mesh-augmented hiatoplasty with fundoplication (LMAH-F) in patients with PEH. - Study Design - The study was designed as a patient- and assessor-blinded randomized controlled pilot trial, registration number: DRKS00004492 (www.germanctr.de/). Patients with symptomatic PEH were eligible and assigned by central randomization to LMAH-C or LMAH-F. Endpoints were postoperative gastroesophageal reflux, complications, and quality of life 12 months postoperatively. - Results - Forty patients (9 male, 31 female) were randomized. Patients were well matched for baseline characteristics. At 3 months, the DeMeester score was higher after LMAH-C compared with LMAH-F (40.9 ± 39.9 vs. 9.6 ± 17; p = 0.048). At 12 months, the reflux syndrome score was higher after LMAH-C compared with LMAH-F (1.9 ± 1.2 vs. 1.1 ± 0.4; p = 0.020). In 53% of LMAH-C patients and 17% of LMAH-F patients, postoperative esophagitis was present (p = 0.026). Values of dysphagia (2.1 ± 1.6 vs 1.9 ± 1.4; p = 0.737), gas bloating (2.6 ± 1.4 vs 2.8 ± 1.4; p = 0.782), and quality of life (116.0 ± 16.2 vs 115.9 ± 15.8; p = 0.992) were similar. Relevant postoperative complications occurred in 4 (10%) patients and did not differ between the groups. - Conclusions - Laparoscopic repair of PEH should be combined with a fundoplication to avoid postoperative gastroesophageal reflux and resulting esophagitis. Fundoplication-related side effects do not appear to be clinically relevant. Multicenter randomized trials are required to confirm these findings.
DOI:doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.03.003
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.03.003
 Volltext: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107275151500191X
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.03.003
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
K10plus-PPN:1726091716
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68623322   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang