Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Matthes, Harald [VerfasserIn]   i
 Thronicke, Anja [VerfasserIn]   i
 Hofheinz, Ralf-Dieter [VerfasserIn]   i
 Baars, Erik [VerfasserIn]   i
 Martin, David [VerfasserIn]   i
 Huber, Roman [VerfasserIn]   i
 Breitkreuz, Thomas [VerfasserIn]   i
 Bar-Sela, Gil [VerfasserIn]   i
 Galun, Daniel [VerfasserIn]   i
 Schad, Friedemann [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Statement to an insufficient systematic review on viscum album L. therapy
Verf.angabe:Harald Matthes, Anja Thronicke, Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz, Erik Baars, David Martin, Roman Huber, Thomas Breitkreuz, Gil Bar-Sela, Daniel Galun and Friedemann Schad
E-Jahr:2020
Jahr:18 Feb 2020
Umfang:9 S.
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 28.10.2020
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine
Ort Quelle:New York, NY : Hindawi, 2004
Jahr Quelle:2020
Band/Heft Quelle:9(2020) Artikel-Nummer ID 7091039, 9 Seiten
ISSN Quelle:1741-4288
Abstract:Background. Up to 88% of oncological patients apply complementary therapies and up to 77% apply complementary mistletoe therapy in the context of integrative oncological approaches. An evidence-based consultation of oncological health professionals regarding complementary therapies used in Germany is missing. Therefore, a new S3-Guideline for Complementary Medicine in the Treatment of Oncological Patients is under development and is anticipated to be finalized in November 2020. It will be based on evidence-based publications and systematic reviews on complementary therapies in oncology. A recently published two-part systematic review on mistletoe treatment in oncology has been reevaluated. Methods. The latest published systematic two-part review on mistletoe has been systematically proofread and checked in compliance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Intervention and the AMSTAR 2 (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews) tool. Results. The here discussed two-part review is incomplete, lacks sound accuracy including insufficient assessment of the risk of bias, and contains imprecise statements. In addition, it does not sufficiently comply with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Intervention and the AMSTAR 2 tool. Conclusion. In view of the approaching release of a new guideline in the field of complementary therapies in oncology, the present statement draws attention to a lack of profound methodology of conductance of a recently released systematic review on mistletoe. In consequence, a comprehensive overview of published mistletoe studies, i.e., a meta-analysis with a sound methodology of conductance, is necessary.
DOI:doi:10.1155/2020/7091039
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7091039
 Volltext: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ecam/2020/7091039/
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7091039
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
K10plus-PPN:1736869930
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68654842   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang