| Titel: | Necessity and proportionality in international peace and security law |
|---|
| Mitwirkende: | Kreß, Claus [HerausgeberIn]  |
|---|
| | Lawless, Robert [HerausgeberIn] |
|---|
| Verf.angabe: | volume editors professor Claus Kreß, major Robert Lawless |
|---|
| Verlagsort: | New York, NY |
|---|
| Verlag: | Oxford University Press |
|---|
| E-Jahr: | 2021 |
|---|
| Jahr: | [2021] |
|---|
| Umfang: | xix, 500 Seiten |
|---|
| Gesamttitel/Reihe: | The Lieber studies ; volume 5 |
|---|
| Fussnoten: | Literaturangaben, Register |
|---|
| Ang. zum Inhalt: | An encounter of international law with morality |
|---|
| | Necessity and proportionality in morality and law / Jeff McMahan |
|---|
| | Considerations of overarching significance |
|---|
| | On the continuous and concurrent application of ad bellum and in bello proportionality / Eliav Lieblich |
|---|
| | The international law governing the use of force |
|---|
| | The essential link between proportionality and necessity in the exercise of self-defense / Geoffrey S. Corn |
|---|
| | The unwilling and unable test for extraterritorial defensive force : why force is permitted against the territorial state / Jens David Ohlin |
|---|
| | Drones programs, the individualization of war, and the ad bellum principle of proportionality / Rebecca Mignot-Mahdavi |
|---|
| | The quest for an internal jus ad bellum : international law's missing link, mere distraction, or Pandora's Box? / Tom Ruys |
|---|
| | Article 51's reporting requirement as a space for legal argument and factfulness / Larissa van den Herik |
|---|
| | The international law of armed conflicts |
|---|
| | Sequences in military necessity for the jus in bello / Dino Kritsiotis |
|---|
| | Practical and conceptual challenges to doctrinal military necessity / Robert Lawless |
|---|
| | Considerations of necessity under Article 57(2)(a)(ii), (c), and (3) and proportionality under Article 51(5)(b) and Article 57(2)(b) of additional Protocol I : is there room for an integrated approach? / Wolff Heintschel von Heinegg |
|---|
| | Specifying the proportionality test and the standard of due precaution : problems of prognostic assessment in determining the meaning of "may be expected" and "anticipated" / Stefan Oeter |
|---|
| | The proportionality rule and mental health harm in war / Sarah Knuckey, Alex Moorehead, Audrey McCalley, and Adam Brown |
|---|
| | Towards the special computer law of targeting : "fully autonomous" weapons systems and the proportionality test / Masahiro Kurosaki |
|---|
| | Jus post bellum |
|---|
| | The duty to pay reparations for the violation of the prohibition of the use of force in international relations and the Jus Post Bellum / Elisabeth Günnewig |
|---|
| ISBN: | 978-0-19-753737-4 |
|---|
| Abstract: | Necessity and proportionality hold a firm place in the international law governing the use of force by states, as well as in the law of armed conflict. However, the precise contours of these two requirements are uncertain and controversial. The aim of Necessity and Proportionality in International Peace and Security Law is to explore how necessity and proportionality manifest themselves in the modern world under the law governing the use of force and the law of armed conflict, and how they relate to each other. The book explores the ways in which necessity and proportionality are applied in practice and addresses pressing legal issues in the law on the use of force, including the controversial "unwilling and unable" test for the use of force in self-defense, drones and targeted killing, the application of this legal regime during civil war, and the need for further transparency in states' justification for the use of force in self-defense. The analysis of the role of military necessity within the law of armed conflict on the modern battlefield focuses on the history and nature of the principle of military necessity, the proper application of the principle of proportionality, how commanders should account for mental harm in calculating proportionality, and the role artificial intelligence and autonomous weapons systems may play in proportionality analysis. The book concludes with a discussion of the potential role of proportionality in the law governing post-conflict contexts. |
|---|
| URL: | Inhaltsverzeichnis: https://swbplus.bsz-bw.de/bsz1694516059inh.htm |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: | (s)Internationales Recht / (s)Intervention / (s)Friedenssicherung |
|---|
| Dokumenttyp: | Aufsatzsammlung |
|---|
| Sprache: | eng |
|---|
| Bibliogr. Hinweis: | Erscheint auch als : Online-Ausgabe: Necessity and proportionality in international peace and security law. - New York, NY : Oxford University Press, 2020. - 1 Online-Ressource (xix, 500 Seiten) |
|---|
| | Erscheint auch als : Online-Ausgabe: Necessity and proportionality in international peace and security law. - Oxford : Oxford University Press USA - OSO, 2021. - 1 Online-Ressource (xx, 500 Seiten) |
|---|
| RVK-Notation: | PR 2622 |
|---|
| K10plus-PPN: | 1694516059 |
|---|
| Verknüpfungen: | → Übergeordnete Aufnahme |
|---|
Necessity and proportionality in international peace and security law / Kreß, Claus [HerausgeberIn]; [2021]
