Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Walker, Tilman [VerfasserIn]   i
 Gotterbarm, Tobias [VerfasserIn]   i
 Bruckner, Thomas [VerfasserIn]   i
 Merle, Christian [VerfasserIn]   i
 Streit, Marcus R. [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Total versus unicompartmental knee replacement for isolated lateral osteoarthritis
Titelzusatz:a matched-pairs study
Verf.angabe:Tilman Walker, Tobias Gotterbarm, Thomas Bruckner, Christian Merle, Marcus R. Streit
E-Jahr:2014
Jahr:12 August 2014
Umfang:6 S.
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 18.12.2020
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: International orthopaedics
Ort Quelle:Berlin : Springer, 1977
Jahr Quelle:2014
Band/Heft Quelle:38(2014), 11, Seite 2259-2264
ISSN Quelle:1432-5195
Abstract:PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the functional outcome of patients following unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) using the Oxford domed lateral UKR to patients who underwent cruciate-retaining total knee replacement (TKR) for isolated osteoarthritis in the lateral compartment. - METHODS: With the help of our institutional database, we retrospectively identified 22 matched pairs with regards to age, gender and body mass index (BMI). Functional outcome was measured using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and range of motion (ROM). Complications and revisions were recorded. - RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 22 (UKR) and 19 (TKR) months, respectively. Patients following UKR had a statistically significant higher mean postoperative OKS and ROM: mean OKS was 43 [standard deviation (SD) 4] for UKR and 37 (SD 9) for TKR, respectively (p = 0.023); ROM was 127° (SD 13) for UKR and 107° (SD 17) for TKR (p < 0.001). Additionally the change in score was statistically significant higher in patients following UKR in the OKS (14.3 (SD 6) vs. 9.6 (SD 8)) and in the range of motion (+12° (SD 19) vs. -3° (SD 20)), (p = 0.041 and p = 0.01 respectively). Survival at two years using revision for any reason as the endpoint was 96% [95% confidence interval (CI) 72-99] for UKR and 100% for TKR (Log-rank test, p = 0.317). - CONCLUSION: The functional results of mobile-bearing UKR for isolated osteoarthritis in the lateral compartment compare favourably to those after cruciate-retaining TKR in the short term. To compare survival and complications after both procedures, longer-term follow-up is necessary.
DOI:doi:10.1007/s00264-014-2473-0
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2473-0
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2473-0
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:Adult
 Aged
 Aged, 80 and over
 Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
 Female
 Humans
 Knee Prosthesis
 Male
 Matched-Pair Analysis
 Middle Aged
 Osteoarthritis, Knee
 Prosthesis Design
 Range of Motion, Articular
 Recovery of Function
K10plus-PPN:1743248938
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68674780   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang