Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Riemann, Lennart [VerfasserIn]   i
 Beqiri, Erta [VerfasserIn]   i
 Younsi, Alexander [VerfasserIn]   i
 Czosnyka, Marek [VerfasserIn]   i
 Smielewski, Peter [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Predictive and discriminative power of pressure reactivity Indices in traumatic brain injury
Verf.angabe:Lennart Riemann, Erta Beqiri, Alexander Younsi, Marek Czosnyka, Peter Smielewski
E-Jahr:2020
Jahr:14 March 2020
Umfang:9 S.
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 19.01.2021
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Neurosurgery
Ort Quelle:Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1977
Jahr Quelle:2020
Band/Heft Quelle:87(2020), 4, Seite 655-663
ISSN Quelle:1524-4040
Abstract:Dysfunctional cerebral blood flow autoregulation plays a crucial role in the secondary damage after traumatic brain injury. The pressure reactivity index (PRx) can be used to monitor dynamic cerebral blood flow autoregulation indirectly.To test different versions of the long pressure reactivity index (LPRx), which is based on minute-by-minute data and calculated over extended time windows, and to study their predictive ability and examine whether “long” and “short” pressure reactivity indices could improve predictive power.PRx and 3 versions of the LPRx calculated over 20-, 60-, and 240-min time windows were assessed in relation to outcome at 6 mo in 855 patients with traumatic brain injury. Predictive power and discriminative ability of indices were evaluated using area under the operator curves and determination of critical thresholds. PRx and LPR indices were combined to evaluate whether LPR indices could improve outcome prediction by adding information about static components of autoregulation.Correlation of each LPRx with the PRx decreased with increased time windows. LPR indices performed successively worse in their predictive and discriminative ability from 20-min to 240-min time frames. PRx had a significantly higher predictive ability compared to each LPRx. Combining LPRx and PRx did not lead to an improvement of predictive power compared to the PRx alone.The critical threshold and predictive value of the PRx for unfavorable outcome and mortality have been confirmed in one of the largest so far published patient cohorts. LPRx performed significantly worse, and its discriminative and predictive abilities decreased with an increasing calculation window.
DOI:doi:10.1093/neuros/nyaa039
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyaa039
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyaa039
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
K10plus-PPN:1744942994
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68681293   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang