A new conditional performance score for the evaluation of adaptive group sequential designs with sample size recalculation

• Verfasst von: Herrmann, Carolin [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Pilz, Maximilian [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Kieser, Meinhard [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Rauch, Geraldine [VerfasserIn]
• Titel: A new conditional performance score for the evaluation of adaptive group sequential designs with sample size recalculation
• Verf.angabe: Carolin Herrmann, Maximilian Pilz, Meinhard Kieser, Geraldine Rauch
• E-Jahr: 2020
• Jahr: 06 April 2020
• Umfang: 34 S.
• Fussnoten: Gesehen am 25.03.2021
• Titel Quelle: Enthalten in: Statistics in medicine
• Ort Quelle: Chichester [u.a.] : Wiley, 1982
• Jahr Quelle: 2020
• Band/Heft Quelle: 39(2020), Seite 2067-2100
• ISSN Quelle: 1097-0258
• DOI: doi:10.1002/sim.8534
• Datenträger: Online-Ressource
• Sprache: eng
• Sach-SW: adaptive group-sequential design
• Sach-SW: clinical trial
• Sach-SW: performance score
• Sach-SW: sample size recalculation
• K10plus-PPN: 1752411803

Abstract

In standard clinical trial designs, the required sample size is fixed in the planning stage based on initial parameter assumptions. It is intuitive that the correct choice of the sample size is of major importance for an ethical justification of the trial. The required parameter assumptions should be based on previously published results from the literature. In clinical practice, however, historical data often do not exist or show highly variable results. Adaptive group sequential designs allow a sample size recalculation after a planned unblinded interim analysis in order to adjust the sample size during the ongoing trial. So far, there exist no unique standards to assess the performance of sample size recalculation rules. Single performance criteria commonly reported are given by the power and the average sample size; the variability of the recalculated sample size and the conditional power distribution are usually ignored. Therefore, the need for an adequate performance score combining these relevant performance criteria is evident. To judge the performance of an adaptive design, there exist two possible perspectives, which might also be combined: Either the global performance of the design can be addressed, which averages over all possible interim results, or the conditional performance is addressed, which focuses on the remaining performance conditional on a specific interim result. In this work, we give a compact overview of sample size recalculation rules and performance measures. Moreover, we propose a new conditional performance score and apply it to various standard recalculation rules by means of Monte-Carlo simulations.