Comparison of the performance of the leap motion controllerTM with a standard marker-based motion capture system

• Verfasst von: Ganguly, Amartya [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Rashidi, Gabriel [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Mombaur, Katja [VerfasserIn]
• Titel: Comparison of the performance of the leap motion controllerTM with a standard marker-based motion capture system
• Verf.angabe: Amartya Ganguly, Gabriel Rashidi and Katja Mombaur
• E-Jahr: 2021
• Jahr: 3 March 2021
• Umfang: 15 S.
• Teil: volume:21
• Teil: year:2021
• Teil: number:5
• Teil: elocationid:1750
• Teil: pages:1-15
• Teil: extent:15
• Fussnoten: Im Titel ist "TM" hochgestellt ; Gesehen am 04.08.2021
• Titel Quelle: Enthalten in: Sensors
• Ort Quelle: Basel : MDPI, 2001
• Jahr Quelle: 2021
• Band/Heft Quelle: 21(2021), 5, Artikel-ID 1750, Seite 1-15
• ISSN Quelle: 1424-8220
• DOI: doi:10.3390/s21051750
• Datenträger: Online-Ressource
• Sprache: eng
• Sach-SW: Bland-Altman analysis
• Sach-SW: finger kinematics
• Sach-SW: Leap Motion Controller™
• Sach-SW: motion capture
• K10plus-PPN: 1755788436

Abstract

Over the last few years, the Leap Motion Controller™ (LMC) has been increasingly used in clinical environments to track hand, wrist and forearm positions as an alternative to the gold-standard motion capture systems. Since the LMC is marker-less, portable, easy-to-use and low-cost, it is rapidly being adopted in healthcare services. This paper demonstrates the comparison of finger kinematic data between the LMC and a gold-standard marker-based motion capture system, Qualisys Track Manager (QTM). Both systems were time synchronised, and the participants performed abduction/adduction of the thumb and flexion/extension movements of all fingers. The LMC and QTM were compared in both static measuring finger segment lengths and dynamic flexion movements of all fingers. A Bland-Altman plot was used to demonstrate the performance of the LMC versus QTM with Pearson’s correlation (r) to demonstrate trends in the data. Only the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP) joint of the middle and ring finger during flexion/extension demonstrated acceptable agreement (r = 0.9062; r = 0.8978), but with a high mean bias. In conclusion, the study shows that currently, the LMC is not suitable to replace gold-standard motion capture systems in clinical settings. Further studies should be conducted to validate the performance of the LMC as it is updated and upgraded.