Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Buk, Michal [VerfasserIn]   i
 Rengier, Fabian [VerfasserIn]   i
 Mokry, Theresa [VerfasserIn]   i
 Riffel, Johannes [VerfasserIn]   i
 Giannitsis, Evangelos [VerfasserIn]   i
 Kihm, Lars Philipp [VerfasserIn]   i
 Malikova, Hana [VerfasserIn]   i
 Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich [VerfasserIn]   i
 Stackelberg, Oyunbileg von [VerfasserIn]   i
 Weber, Tim [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Appropriateness of CT pulmonary angiograms according to current diagnostic guidelines based on risk stratification
Titelzusatz:a retrospective single-center study
Verf.angabe:Michal Buk, Fabian Rengier, Theresa Mokry, Johannes Riffel, Evangelos Giannitsis, Lars Kihm, Hana Malikova, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor, Oyunbileg von Stackelberg, Tim Frederik Weber
E-Jahr:2021
Jahr:March 12, 2021
Umfang:6 S.
Teil:volume:165
 year:2021
 number:1
 pages:51-56
 extent:6
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 26.04.2021
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci. Lékařská FakultaBiomedical papers
Ort Quelle:Prague, 1998
Jahr Quelle:2021
Band/Heft Quelle:165(2021), 1, Seite 51-56
ISSN Quelle:1804-7521
Abstract:Background and Aim. Assessment of appropriateness of CT pulmonary angiograms (CTPA) in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) is based on risk stratification algorithms such as simplified the Geneva Score (sGS) in combination with D-dimer blood tests. The aim of this study was to validate the diagnostic yield and appropriateness of CTPA examinations in accordance with 2014 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines. Materials and Methods. Data from 155 outpatients who underwent CTPA for clinical suspicion of PE were gathered from the radiology information system (RIS) and the clinical information system (CIS). We assessed the presence of sGS items and D-dimer blood test results in RIS from CTPA request forms and from clinical documentation in CIS. Results. Based on the RIS, there were 2.6% patients with high (sGS≥3) and 97.4% patients with low pre-test PE probability (sGS<3), and CTPA indication was formally comprehendible in 75.5% using sGS and D-dimer blood tests. Based on RIS and CIS data in combination, there were 41.3% patients with high and 58.7% patients with low pre-test PE probability, and CTPA indication was formally comprehendible in 88.4%. Using RIS and CIS in combination, PE probability was upgraded from low to high probability in 39.7% compared with RIS alone. In 12.9%, there was a lack of data in RIS for CTPA justification. Conclusion. There is a high diagnostic yield when applying current diagnostic guidelines to our data. There was however a notable discrepancy between the data transferred to the CTPA request forms from the full clinical documentation, therefore not readily available for clinical decision making.
DOI:doi:10.5507/bp.2020.049
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext ; Verlag: https://doi.org/10.5507/bp.2020.049
 Volltext: http://biomed.papers.upol.cz/doi/10.5507/bp.2020.049.html
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5507/bp.2020.049
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
K10plus-PPN:1755937318
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68728066   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang