Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Schochow, Maximilian [VerfasserIn]   i
 Rubeis, Giovanni [VerfasserIn]   i
 Büchner-Mögling, Grit [VerfasserIn]   i
 Fries, Hansjakob [VerfasserIn]   i
 Steger, Florian [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Social freezing in medical practice
Titelzusatz:experiences and attitudes of gynecologists in Germany
Verf.angabe:Maximilian Schochow, Giovanni Rubeis, Grit Büchner-Mögling, Hansjakob Fries, Florian Steger
Jahr:2018
Umfang:10 S.
Fussnoten:published: 09 September 2017 ; Gesehen am 12.05.2021
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Science and engineering ethics
Ort Quelle:Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 1995
Jahr Quelle:2018
Band/Heft Quelle:24(2018), 5, Seite 1483-1492
ISSN Quelle:1471-5546
Abstract:Surveys of the German public have revealed a high acceptance of social freezing, i.e. oocyte conservation without medical indication. Up to now, there are no investigations available on the experiences and attitudes of health professionals towards social freezing. Between August 2015 and January 2016, we surveyed gynecologists Germany-wide on the topic social freezing. Five gynecologists specialized in reproductive medicine and five office-based gynecologists in standard care were chosen for the survey. The survey was conducted with an explorative, qualitative research design. The demand for social freezing in Germany is low. With regard to their fertility age, most women attend consultations too late, they have only little previous knowledge and false expectations. The gynecologists consider it the duty of society and politics to provide for the compatibility of family and work. They relate late parenthood to disadvantages primarily for the children. A majority of the gynecologists interviewed tend to advise natural reproduction. Social freezing is often mistaken as a kind of fertility insurance. Thus, it is necessary that physicians inform women early about the possibilities and limitations of social freezing. In the first place, social freezing is not a medical or medical-ethical topic. Women consider the method as a possibility to ensure the compatibility of family and work. This compatibility should be mostly perceived as a political topic. It cannot be a medical task to solve this issue. In fact, a debate in society as a whole is necessary that includes all relevant actors.
DOI:doi:10.1007/s11948-017-9970-7
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9970-7
 Volltext: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11948-017-9970-7
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9970-7
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:Attitude of Health Personnel
 Autonomy
 Consultation
 Cryopreservation
 Ethics, Medical
 Family
 Family Planning Services
 Female
 Fertility
 Freezing
 Germany
 Gynecologists
 Gynecology
 Humans
 Oocytes
 Physicians
 Pregnancy
 Social freezing
 Surveys and Questionnaires
 Work-Life Balance
K10plus-PPN:1757716556
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68737243   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang