Caries experience after periodontal treatment in aggressive and chronic periodontitis

• Verfasst von: Bäumer, Amelie [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Eickholz, Peter [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Reitmeir, Peter [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Staehle, Hans Jörg [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Frese, Cornelia [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Wohlrab, Theresa Friederike [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Pretzl, Bernadette [VerfasserIn]
• Titel: Caries experience after periodontal treatment in aggressive and chronic periodontitis
• Titelzusatz: results of a 10-year follow-up
• Verf.angabe: Amelie Meyer-Bäumer, Peter Eickholz, Peter Reitmeir, Hans Jörg Staehle, Cornelia Frese, Theresa Wohlrab & Bernadette Pretzl
• E-Jahr: 2013
• Jahr: 28 Jan 2013
• Umfang: 7 S.
• Teil: volume:71
• Teil: year:2013
• Teil: number:5
• Teil: pages:1129-1135
• Teil: extent:7
• Fussnoten: Gesehen am 21.05.2021
• Titel Quelle: Enthalten in: Acta odontologica Scandinavica
• Ort Quelle: London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis Group, 1939
• Jahr Quelle: 2013
• Band/Heft Quelle: 71(2013), 5, Seite 1129-1135
• ISSN Quelle: 1502-3850
• DOI: doi:10.3109/00016357.2012.750012
• Datenträger: Online-Ressource
• Sprache: eng
• Sach-SW: aggressive periodontitis
• Sach-SW: DMF-S
• Sach-SW: DMF-T
• Sach-SW: periodontal disease
• Sach-SW: supportive periodontal therapy (SPT)
• K10plus-PPN: 1758313455

Abstract

Objective. To compare the increase of DMF-T and DMF-S in patients with aggressive periodontitis (AgP) and chronic periodontitis (ChP) after active periodontal therapy. Materials and methods. One hundred and thirty-six periodontally treated patients were re-examined after 10 years. Dental and periodontal status was assessed and patients' charts were screened for diagnosis, compliance to supportive periodontal treatment (SPT) and DMF-T/-S at baseline and re-examination. δDMF-T/-S was calculated and multi-level regression analyses were performed to identify factors contributing to increase of DMF-T/-S. Results. Thirty patients with AgP, 37 with moderate ChP and 69 with severe ChP could be included. δDMF-T between first visit and re-examination was 2.07 (SD = 2.51, range = 0-14 teeth), mean δDMF-S = 14.66 (SD = 14.54, range = 0-83 surfaces). Patients with AgP showed a similar increase in DMF-T/-S to those with ChP. Regression analysis identified compliance as the only factor significantly accounting for preventing an increase of DMF-S (p = 0.017). No factor had a significant impact on DMF-T. Conclusions. DMF-T and DMF-S developed similarly in periodontally-treated patients with AgP and ChP during a follow-up of 10 years. SPT showed a positive influence on avoiding decline in DMF-S in periodontally compromised patients. No significant impact was detected for all other studied factors.