Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Pannen, Sarah T. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Maldonado, Sandra González [VerfasserIn]   i
 Nonnenmacher, Tobias [VerfasserIn]   i
 Sowah, Solomon A. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Gruner, Laura F. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Watzinger, Cora [VerfasserIn]   i
 Nischwitz, Karin [VerfasserIn]   i
 Ulrich, Cornelia M. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Kaaks, Rudolf [VerfasserIn]   i
 Schübel, Ruth [VerfasserIn]   i
 Grafetstätter, Mirja [VerfasserIn]   i
 Kühn, Tilman [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Adherence and dietary composition during intermittent vs. continuous calorie restriction
Titelzusatz:follow-up data from a randomized controlled trial in adults with overweight or obesity
Verf.angabe:Sarah T. Pannen, Sandra González Maldonado, Tobias Nonnenmacher, Solomon A. Sowah, Laura F. Gruner, Cora Watzinger, Karin Nischwitz, Cornelia M. Ulrich, Rudolf Kaaks, Ruth Schübel, Mirja Grafetstätter and Tilman Kühn
E-Jahr:2021
Jahr:5 April 2021
Umfang:15 S.
Teil:volume:13
 year:2021
 number:4
 elocationid:1195
 pages:1-15
 extent:15
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 25.05.2021
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Nutrients
Ort Quelle:Basel : MDPI, 2009
Jahr Quelle:2021
Band/Heft Quelle:13(2021), 4, Artikel-ID 1195, Seite 1-15
ISSN Quelle:2072-6643
Abstract:Although intermittent calorie restriction (ICR) has become popular as an alternative weight loss strategy to continuous calorie restriction (CCR), there is insufficient evidence on diet quality during ICR and on its feasibility over longer time periods. Thus, we compared dietary composition and adherence between ICR and CCR in a follow-up analysis of a randomized trial. A total of 98 participants with overweight or obesity [BMI (kg/m2) 25-39.9, 35-65 years, 49% females] were randomly assigned to ICR, operationalized as a “5:2 diet” (energy intake: ~100% on five non-restricted (NR) days, ~25% on two restricted (R) days), or CCR (daily energy intake: ~80%). The trial included a 12-week (wk) intervention phase, and follow-up assessments at wk24, wk50 and wk102. Apart from a higher proportion of energy intake from protein with ICR vs. CCR during the intervention (wk2: p < 0.001; wk12: p = 0.002), there were no significant differences with respect to changes in dietary composition over time between the groups, while overall adherence to the interventions appeared to be good. No significant difference between ICR and CCR regarding weight change at wk102 was observed (p = 0.63). However, self-reported adherence was worse for ICR than CCR, with 71.1% vs. 32.5% of the participants reporting not to or only rarely have followed the regimen to which they were assigned between wk50 and wk102. These results indicate that within a weight management setting, ICR and CCR were equivalent in achieving modest weight loss over two years while affecting dietary composition in a comparable manner.
DOI:doi:10.3390/nu13041195
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext ; Verlag: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13041195
 Volltext: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/4/1195
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13041195
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:compliance
 diet quality
 energy intake
 fasting
 food records
 intermittent energy restriction
 obesity
 weight loss
K10plus-PPN:1758440562
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68740519   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang