Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Kühne Escolà, Jordi [VerfasserIn]   i
 Nagel, Simon [VerfasserIn]   i
 Panitz, Verena [VerfasserIn]   i
 Reiff, Tilman [VerfasserIn]   i
 Gutschalk, Alexander [VerfasserIn]   i
 Gumbinger, Christoph [VerfasserIn]   i
 Purrucker, Jan [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Challenges of acute ischemic stroke treatment in orally anticoagulated patients via telemedicine
Verf.angabe:Jordi Kühne Escolà, Simon Nagel, Verena Panitz, Tilman Reiff, Alexander Gutschalk, Christoph Gumbinger and Jan Christoph Purrucker
E-Jahr:2021
Jahr:2 May 2021
Umfang:10 S.
Teil:volume:10
 year:2021
 number:9
 elocationid:1956
 pages:1-10
 extent:10
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 10.06.2021
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Journal of Clinical Medicine
Ort Quelle:Basel : MDPI, 2012
Jahr Quelle:2021
Band/Heft Quelle:10(2021), 9, Artikel-ID 1956, Seite 1-10
ISSN Quelle:2077-0383
Abstract:Background: Managing acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in patients receiving treatment with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) or non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) is difficult and the challenge this poses for stroke telemedicine remains unexplored. Methods: We analyzed data from a random sample (n = 1500) of all teleneurological consultations conducted between July 2015 and December 2017. Management of patients suffering AIS with and without prior oral anticoagulation treatment was characterized, including potential vs. actual treatment with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and reasons for withholding it. Results: n = 359 patients had suffered an AIS, of whom 63 (17.5%) were under treatment with oral anticoagulants (VKA, n = 24; NOAC, n = 39). Administration of IVT was more common in patients who had not received prior oral anticoagulation treatment (20.3% vs. 3.2%, p < 0.001). NOAC intake was the primary reason for withholding IVT in 37% of orally anticoagulated patients who were found potentially eligible for IVT. Furthermore, patients under oral anticoagulation tended to be transported to the comprehensive stroke center more often (23.8% vs. 13.9%, p = 0.056). Conclusions: AIS in patients on oral anticoagulation treatment is a frequent reason for telestroke consultation, and NOAC intake constitutes an important barrier to administering IVT.
DOI:doi:10.3390/jcm10091956
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext ; Verlag: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10091956
 Volltext: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/9/1956
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10091956
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:cerebral stroke
 cerebrovascular disease
 oral anticoagulation
 telemedicine
 teleneurology
K10plus-PPN:1760248363
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68747102   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang