Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Heijde, Nicky van de [VerfasserIn]   i
 Vissers, Frederique L. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Boggi, Ugo [VerfasserIn]   i
 Dokmak, Safi [VerfasserIn]   i
 Edwin, Bjørn [VerfasserIn]   i
 Hackert, Thilo [VerfasserIn]   i
 Khatkov, Igor E. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Keck, Tobias [VerfasserIn]   i
 Besselink, Marc G. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Abu Hilal, Mohammed [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Designing the European registry on minimally invasive pancreatic surgery
Titelzusatz:a pan-European survey
Verf.angabe:Nicky van der Heijde, Frederique L. Vissers, Ugo Boggi, Safi Dokmak, Bjørn Edwin, Thilo Hackert, Igor E. Khatkov, Tobias Keck, Marc G. Besselink, Mohammed Abu Hilal
Jahr:2021
Umfang:9 S.
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 11.07.2021
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: HPB
Ort Quelle:[London] : Elsevier, 1999
Jahr Quelle:2021
Band/Heft Quelle:23(2021), 4 vom: Apr., Seite 566-574
ISSN Quelle:1477-2574
Abstract:Background - The recent Miami international evidence-based guidelines on minimally invasive pancreatic surgery (MIPS) advise all centers that perform MIPS to participate in multicenter registries to safeguard optimal outcomes and patient safety. During the design phase of a pan-European registry on MIPS, the European consortium of Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery (E-MIPS) sought input from European HPB surgeons. - Methods - An anonymous online questionnaire with 23 questions on MIPS practice was sent to all member centers of the European-African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (E-AHPBA) and E-MIPS. - Results - Completed questionnaires were obtained from 98 centers in 23 countries, of which 75 (76.5%) were academic centers. Centers had a median annual pancreatoduodenectomy volume of 45. The most-performed MIPS procedure was laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (93.9% of centers). Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy was performed in 49% of all centers. Some 25 centers already participated in an ongoing national registry, and were willing to share their data with the European registry on MIPS. The most mentioned (45.4%) maximum time for processing one patient's data into the registry was 10-15 min. - Conclusion - This European survey showed considerable support for the European registry on MIPS.
DOI:doi:10.1016/j.hpb.2020.08.015
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2020.08.015
 Volltext: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1365182X2031128X
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2020.08.015
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
K10plus-PPN:1762650355
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68758382   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang